ArticleJMIR medical informatics2020
Medical Knowledge Graph to Enhance Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Detection on Claim Data: Model Development and Performance Evaluation.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Survey on Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs for Biomedicine and Healthcare.KDD : proceedings. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · 2025Article
- Knowledge-graph-based explainable AI: A systematic review.Journal of information science · 2024Article
- A novel customizing knowledge graph evaluation method for incorporating user needs.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Healthcare knowledge graph construction: A systematic review of the state-of-the-art, open issues, and opportunities.Journal of big data · 2023Article
- Natural Language Processing and Graph Theory: Making Sense of Imaging Records in a Novel Representation Frame.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
- Heterogeneous graph construction and HinSAGE learning from electronic medical records.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Health Natural Language Processing: Methodology Development and Applications.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- Fourteen years of manifestations and factors of health insurance fraud, 2006-2020: a scoping review.Health & justice · 2021Article
- Constructing public health evidence knowledge graph for decision-making support from COVID-19 literature of modelling study.Journal of safety science and resilience = An quan ke xue yu ren xing (Ying wen) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFraud, Waste, and Abuse (FWA) detection is a significant yet challenging problem in the health insurance industry. An essential step in FWA detection is to check whether the medication is clinically reasonable with respect to the diagnosis. Currently, human experts with sufficient medical knowledge are required to perform this task. To reduce the cost, insurance inspectors tend to build an intelligent system to detect suspicious claims with inappropriate diagnoses/medications automatically.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to develop an automated method for making use of a medical knowledge graph to identify clinically suspected claims for FWA detection.
methodsFirst, we identified the medical knowledge that is required to assess the clinical rationality of the claims. We then searched for data sources that contain information to build such knowledge. In this study, we focused on Chinese medical knowledge. Second, we constructed a medical knowledge graph using unstructured knowledge. We used a deep learning-based method to extract the entities and relationships from the knowledge sources and developed a multilevel similarity matching approach to conduct the entity linking. To guarantee the quality of the medical knowledge graph, we involved human experts to review the entity and relationships with lower confidence. These reviewed results could be used to further improve the machine-learning models. Finally, we developed the rules to identify the suspected claims by reasoning according to the medical knowledge graph.
resultsWe collected 185,796 drug labels from the China Food and Drug Administration, 3390 types of disease information from medical textbooks (eg, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis), and information from 5272 examinations as the knowledge sources. The final medical knowledge graph includes 1,616,549 nodes and 5,963,444 edges. We designed three knowledge graph reasoning rules to identify three kinds of inappropriate diagnosis/medications. The experimental results showed that the medical knowledge graph helps to detect 70% of the suspected claims.
conclusionsThe medical knowledge graph-based method successfully identified suspected cases of FWA (such as fraud diagnosis, excess prescription, and irrational prescription) from the claim documents, which helped to improve the efficiency of claim processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.