Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32706709›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

An Untapped Potential in Primary Care: Semi-Structured Interviews with Clinicians on How Patient Portals Will Work for Caregivers in the Safety Net.

Alejandra Casillas, Anupama Gunshekar Cemballi, Anshu Abhat, Miya Lemberg, Jennifer D Portz, Shobha Sadasivaiah, Neda Ratanawongsa, Wagahta Semere, Arleen Brown, Courtney Rees Lyles

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. User Testing of the Veteran Delegation Tool: Qualitative Inquiry.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023
    Article
  9. Physicians' Perspectives on Inpatient Portals: Systematic Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Alejandra CasillasDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4229-7466
Anupama Gunshekar CemballiUCSF Division of General Internal Medicine at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, UCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1453-8963
Anshu AbhatLos Angeles County Department of Health Services, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3631-6579
Miya LembergUCSF Division of General Internal Medicine at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, UCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1674-3100
Jennifer D PortzDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3107-3598
Shobha SadasivaiahOffice of Health Informatics, San Francisco Health Network, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1602-7323
Neda RatanawongsaUCSF Division of General Internal Medicine at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, UCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9944-6923
Wagahta SemereUCSF Division of General Internal Medicine at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, UCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6560-9747
Arleen BrownDivision of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9948-8955
Courtney Rees LylesUCSF Division of General Internal Medicine at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, UCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1111-8595
San Francisco General Hospital · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USHealth Net · USLos Angeles County Department of Health Services · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Social Convoy Palliative Care (Convoy-Pal) Mobile Health for Older Adults with Advanced Heart FailureK76AG059934 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI PORTZ, JENNIFER · 2018 to 2022
$892k
Engaging Diverse Patients in Using an Online Patient PortalR00HS022408 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LYLES, COURTNEY REES · 2015 to 2017
$740k
Integrating Adherence into a Safety Net EHR Tool to Improve Decision-makingK08HS022561 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI RATANAWONGSA, NEDA · 2014 to 2017
$621k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS022561AHRQ HHS K12 HS026407AHRQ HHS R00 HS022408NIA NIH HHS K76 AG059934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients within safety-net settings are less likely to access health information on patient portals, despite expressed interest. Family and friends are important resources to assist these patients (ie, Medicaid recipients, older patients, patients with limited English proficiency) in navigating health systems, and provider support of the use of patient portals among these groups may also facilitate caregivers' use of their patients' portal.

objectiveBecause safety net providers work closely with caregivers to care for their patients, we used qualitative methods to explore safety net providers' perspectives on portal use among caregivers for their patients, especially as there is limited literature about caregivers' use of portals in the safety net.

methodsWe conducted 45- to 60-min semistructured telephone interviews with providers from three large California safety-net health systems. The interviews focused on providers' experiences with caregivers, caregiver roles, and how the portal could be leveraged as a tool to support caregivers in their responsibilities. A total of three coders analyzed the interview transcripts using both deductive and inductive approaches and established a consensus regarding major themes.

resultsOf the 16 participants interviewed, 4 specialized in geriatrics, and all held a leadership or administrative role. We described themes highlighting providers' recognition of potential benefits associated with caregiver portal use and specific challenges to caregiver engagement.

conclusionsProviders recognized the potential for portals to improve information delivery and communication by helping caregivers assist socially and medically complex patients in the safety net. Providers in safety net sites also discussed a clear need for better ways to keep in touch with patients and connect with caregivers, yet security and privacy are perhaps of higher importance in these settings and may pose challenges to portal adoption. They noted that caregivers of patients in the safety net likely face similar communication barriers as patients, especially with respect to digital literacy, health literacy, and English proficiency. Further research is needed to assess and support caregivers' interest and ability to access portals across barriers in health and digital literacy, and English proficiency. Portal platforms and health systems must also address specific strategies to uphold patient preferences while maintaining privacy and security.

Indexed as

CaregiversFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMalePatient PortalsPhysiciansPrimary Health CareSafety-net Providerscaregiversdigital dividemobile phonepatient portalvulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID32706709
PMCPMC7400036
OpenAlexW3026019685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.