Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32706690›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2020

Feasibility and Acceptability of an Adapted Mobile Phone Message Program and Changes in Maternal and Newborn Health Knowledge in Four Provinces of Afghanistan: Single-Group Pre-Post Assessment Study.

Victoria Lebrun, Lisa Dulli, Sayed Omar Alami, Arzoo Sidiqi, Ahmad Shah Sultani, Sayed Haroon Rastagar, Iftikhar Halimzai, Sharif Ahmadzai, Catherine S Todd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Victoria LebrunGlobal Health, Population, and Nutrition, FHI 360, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2925-1498
Lisa DulliGlobal Health, Population, and Nutrition, FHI 360, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3987-8932
Sayed Omar AlamiHelping Mothers and Children Thrive in Afghanistan (HEMAYAT) Project, FHI 360, Kabul, Afghanistan.ORCID 0000-0003-2489-8209
Arzoo SidiqiHelping Mothers and Children Thrive in Afghanistan (HEMAYAT) Project, FHI 360, Kabul, Afghanistan.ORCID 0000-0002-6667-2569
Ahmad Shah SultaniHelping Mothers and Children Thrive in Afghanistan (HEMAYAT) Project, FHI 360, Kabul, Afghanistan.ORCID 0000-0002-4389-3035
Sayed Haroon RastagarHelping Mothers and Children Thrive in Afghanistan (HEMAYAT) Project, FHI 360, Kabul, Afghanistan.ORCID 0000-0001-7687-3674
Iftikhar HalimzaiHealth Promotions Department, Ministry of Public Health, Kabul, Afghanistan.ORCID 0000-0001-8052-0521
Sharif AhmadzaiHelping Mothers and Children Thrive in Afghanistan (HEMAYAT) Project, FHI 360, Kabul, Afghanistan.ORCID 0000-0002-6068-1835
Catherine S ToddGlobal Health, Population, and Nutrition, FHI 360, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3899-5173

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile phone apps for health promotion have expanded in many low- and middle-income countries. Afghanistan, with high maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality rates, a fragile health infrastructure, and high levels of mobile phone ownership, is an ideal setting to examine the utility of such programs. We adapted messages of the Mobile Alliance for Maternal Action (MAMA) program, which was designed to promote healthy behaviors during pregnancy and a newborn's first year of life, to the Afghan context. We then piloted and assessed the program in the provinces of Kabul, Herat, Kandahar, and Balkh.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the MAMA pilot program, and to examine changes in reported maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH) knowledge and attitudes among participants from baseline to follow up.

methodsWe conducted a single-group study with data collected within 10 weeks of enrollment, and data collection was repeated approximately 6 months later. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using structured questionnaires. Eligible participants included pregnant women who had registered to receive fully automated mobile health messages and their husbands. Assessment questionnaires queried sociodemographic details; knowledge, attitudes, and health care-seeking practices; and intervention experience and acceptability at follow up. The number of messages received by a given phone number was extracted from the program database. We descriptively analyzed the feasibility and acceptability data and compared the change in MNCH knowledge between baseline and follow-up measures using the McNemar Chi square test.

resultsOverall, 895 women were enrolled in the MAMA program. Data from 453/625 women (72.5% of the pretest sample) who received voice (n=302) or text (n=151) messages, and 276/427 men (64.6% of the pretest sample) who received voice (n=185) or text (n=91) messages contributing data at both time points were analyzed. At follow up, 699/729 (95.9%) participants were still enrolled in the MAMA program; voice message and SMS text messaging subscribers received 43 and 69 messages on average over the 6-month period, respectively. Participants who were voice message subscribers and female participants more commonly reported missing messages compared with the text message subscribers and men; predominant reasons for missed messages were the subscribers being busy with chores or not having their shared phone with them. Over 90% of men and women reported experiencing benefits from the program, mainly increased knowledge, and 226/453 (49.9%) of the female participants reported referring someone else to the program. Most of the participants (377/453, 83.2% women and 258/276, 93.5% men) believed it was beneficial to include husbands in the program. Joint decision making regarding maternal and child health care increased overall. The proportions of participants with correct knowledge significantly increased for all but one MNCH measure at follow up.

conclusionsThis assessment indicates that the pilot MAMA program is feasible and acceptable in the Afghan context. Further research should be conducted to determine whether program participation leads to improved MNCH knowledge, health practices, and health service utilization in this fragile setting prior to larger scale up.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInfant HealthAfghanistanChildFamilyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyAfghanistanmaternal healthmHealthmobile appsnewborn healthpregnant womenSMSsocial and behavior changevoice message

Identifiers

PMID32706690
PMCPMC7399960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.