Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32706658›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2020

Scheduled Telephone Support for Internet Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression in Patients at Risk for Dropout: Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.

Satu Pihlaja, Jari Lahti, Jari Olavi Lipsanen, Ville Ritola, Eero-Matti Gummerus, Jan-Henry Stenberg, Grigori Joffe

Open access · goldAbstract readPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Satu Pihlaja *Department of Psychiatry, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-2402-6956
Jari Lahti *Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4310-5297
Jari Olavi Lipsanen *Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0746-2745
Ville Ritola *Department of Psychiatry, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-9065-4347
Eero-Matti Gummerus *Department of Psychiatry, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-7485-4429
Jan-Henry Stenberg *Department of Psychiatry, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1327-7757
Grigori Joffe *Department of Psychiatry, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-0782-6812
University of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTherapist-supported, internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) is efficient in the treatment of depression. However, the optimal mode and intensity of therapist support remain to be identified. Scheduled telephone support (STS) may improve adherence and outcomes but, as it is time- and resource-consuming, should be reserved for patients for whom the usual support may be insufficient.

objectiveThis paper aims to reveal whether add-on STS for patients at risk of dropping out improves treatment adherence and symptoms in iCBT for depression.

methodsAmong patients participating in an ongoing large observational routine clinical practice study of iCBT for depression delivered nationwide by Helsinki University Hospital (HUS-iCBT), those demonstrating a ≥14-day delay in initiation of treatment received invitations to this subsidiary STS study. A total of 100 consenting patients were randomly allocated to either HUS-iCBT as usual (control group, n=50) or HUS-iCBT plus add-on STS (intervention group, n=50). Proportions of those reaching midtreatment and treatment end point served as the primary outcome; secondary outcomes were change in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)-measured depressive symptoms and time spent in treatment.

resultsAdd-on STS raised the proportion of patients reaching midtreatment compared with HUS-iCBT as usual (29/50, 58% vs 18/50, 36%; P=.045) and treatment end point (12/50, 24% vs 3/50, 6%; P=.02). Change in BDI score also favored add-on STS (3.63 points vs 1.1 points; P=.049), whereas duration of treatment did not differ.

conclusionsAdd-on STS enhances adherence and symptom improvement of patients at risk of dropping out of iCBT for depression in routine clinical practice.

trial registrationInternational Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 55123131; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN55123131.

Indexed as

AdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionFemaleHumansInternetMaleTelephoneTreatment Outcomeadherencedepressioninternet CBTroutine clinical practicescheduled telephone support

Identifiers

PMID32706658
PMCPMC7413288
OpenAlexW3018743165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.