Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32706445›Full record

ArticleNeuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society2021

The Dorsal Root Ganglion as a Novel Neuromodulatory Target to Evoke Strong and Reproducible Motor Responses in Chronic Motor Complete Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Series of Five Patients.

Sadaf Soloukey, Judith D de Rooij, Rutger Osterthun, Judith Drenthen, Chris I De Zeeuw, Frank J P M Huygen, Biswadjiet S Harhangi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Narrative review of current neuromodulation modalities for spinal cord injury.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sadaf SoloukeyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Judith D de RooijCenter for Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Rutger OsterthunDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Judith DrenthenDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Chris I De ZeeuwDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Frank J P M HuygenCenter for Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Biswadjiet S HarhangiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6983-3164
Erasmus MC · NLCodarts Rotterdam · NLNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience · NL

Funding

Stichting Erasmus Fonds Pijnbestrijding 14-1436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCurrent strategies for motor recovery after spinal cord injury (SCI) aim to facilitate motor performance through modulation of afferent input to the spinal cord using epidural electrical stimulation (EES). The dorsal root ganglion (DRG) itself, the first relay station of these afferent inputs, has not yet been targeted for this purpose. The current study aimed to determine whether DRG stimulation can facilitate clinically relevant motor response in motor complete SCI. MATERIALS AND

methodsFive patients with chronic motor complete SCI were implanted with DRG leads placed bilaterally on level L4 during five days. Based on personalized stimulation protocols, we aimed to evoke dynamic (phase 1) and isotonic (phase 2) motor responses in the bilateral quadriceps muscles. On days 1 and 5, EMG-measurements (root mean square [RMS] values) and clinical muscle force measurements (MRC scoring) were used to measure motor responses and their reproducibility.

resultsIn all patients, DRG-stimulation evoked significant phase 1 and phase 2 motor responses with an MRC ≥4 for all upper leg muscles (rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, and biceps femoris) (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively), leading to a knee extension movement strong enough to facilitate assisted weight bearing. No significant differences in RMS values were observed between days 1 and 5 of the study, indicating that motor responses were reproducible.

conclusionThe current paper provides first evidence that bilateral L4 DRG stimulation can evoke reproducible motor responses in the upper leg, sufficient for assisted weight bearing in patients with chronic motor complete SCI. As such, a new target for SCI treatment has surfaced, using existing stimulation devices, making the technique directly clinically accessible.

Indexed as

Ganglia, SpinalSpinal Cord InjuriesHumansMuscle, SkeletalReproducibility of ResultsSpinal CordMotor dysfunctionneurostimulationspinal cord injuriesspinal ganglia

Identifiers

PMID32706445
PMCPMC8359424
OpenAlexW3044820202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.