ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2020
Predicting eating disorders from Internet activity.
Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating change in body image concerns following a single session digital intervention.Body image · 2023Trial
- Effect of ChatGPT use on eating disorders and body image.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Review
- Harnessing Internet Search Data as a Potential Tool for Medical Diagnosis: Literature Review.JMIR mental health · 2025Review
- Differentiation between atypical anorexia nervosa and anorexia nervosa using machine learning.The International journal of eating disorders · 2024Article
- Development of transdiagnostic clinical risk prediction models for 12-month onset and course of eating disorders among adolescents in the community.The International journal of eating disorders · 2023Article
- A machine learning investigation into the temporal dynamics of physical activity-mediated emotional regulation in adolescents with anorexia nervosa and healthy controls.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2023Article
- Potential benefits and limitations of machine learning in the field of eating disorders: current research and future directions.Journal of eating disorders · 2022Review
- Pragmatic AI-augmentation in mental healthcare: Key technologies, potential benefits, and real-world challenges and solutions for frontline clinicians.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Machine learning to advance the prediction, prevention and treatment of eating disorders.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2021Article
- Unique Internet Search Strategies of Individuals With Self-Stated Autism: Quantitative Analysis of Search Engine Users' Investigative Behaviors.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Detecting Impending Stroke From Cognitive Traits Evident in Internet Searches: Analysis of Archival Data.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Leveraging the Power of Nondisruptive Technologies to Optimize Mental Health Treatment: Case Study.JMIR mental health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveEating disorders (EDs) compromise the health and functioning of affected individuals, but it can often take them several years to acknowledge their illness and seek treatment. Early identification of individuals with EDs is a public health priority, and innovative approaches are needed for such identification and ultimate linkage with evidence-based interventions. This study examined whether Internet activity data can predict ED risk/diagnostic status, potentially informing timely interventions.
methodParticipants were 936 women who completed a clinically validated online survey for EDs, and 231 of them (24.7%) contributed their Internet browsing history. A machine learning algorithm used key attributes from participants' Internet activity histories to predict their ED status: clinical/subclinical ED, high risk for an ED, or no ED.
resultsThe algorithm reached an accuracy of 52.6% in predicting ED risk/diagnostic status, compared to random decision accuracy of 38.1%, a relative improvement of 38%. The most predictive Internet search history variables were the following: use of keywords related to ED symptoms and websites promoting ED content, participant age, median browsing events per day, and fraction of daily activity at noon. DISCUSSION: ED risk or clinical status can be predicted via machine learning with moderate accuracy using Internet activity variables. This model, if replicated in larger samples where it demonstrates stronger predictive value, could identify populations where further assessment is merited. Future iterations could also inform tailored digital interventions, timed to be provided when target online behaviors occur, thereby potentially improving the well-being of many individuals who may otherwise remain undetected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.