Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32706431›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2021

An evaluation of additives for mitigating the risk of virus-contaminated feed using an ice-block challenge model.

Scott A Dee, Megan C Niederwerder, Roy Edler, Dan Hanson, Aaron Singrey, Roger Cochrane, Gordon Spronk, Eric Nelson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Isolation of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus from feed ingredients and complete feed, with subsequent RT-qPCR analysis.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Risk and Mitigation of African Swine Fever Virus in Feed.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Scott A DeePipestone Applied Research, Pipestone Veterinary Services, Pipestone, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8691-3887
Megan C NiederwerderDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA.
Roy EdlerPipestone Applied Research, Pipestone Veterinary Services, Pipestone, Minnesota, USA.
Dan HansonPipestone Applied Research, Pipestone Veterinary Services, Pipestone, Minnesota, USA.
Aaron SingreyDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, USA.
Roger CochranePipestone Applied Research, Pipestone Veterinary Services, Pipestone, Minnesota, USA.
Gordon SpronkPipestone Applied Research, Pipestone Veterinary Services, Pipestone, Minnesota, USA.
Eric NelsonDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, USA.
Pipestone (United States) · USSouth Dakota State University · USKansas State University · US

Funding

Foundation of Food and Agricultural ResearchMinnesota State Board of Animal HealthSwine Health Information Center
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of animal feed as a vehicle for the transport and transmission of viral diseases was first identified during the porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus (PEDV) epidemic in North America. Since that time, various feed additives have been evaluated at the laboratory level to measure their effect on viral viability and infectivity in contaminated feed using bioassay piglet models. While a valid first step, the conditions of these studies were not representative of commercial swine production. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of feed additives to mitigate the risk of virus-contaminated feed using a model based on real-world conditions. This new model used an 'ice-block' challenge, containing equal concentrations of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), Senecavirus A (SVA) and PEDV, larger populations of pigs, representative commercial facilities and environments, along with realistic volumes of complete feed supplemented with selected additives. Following supplementation, the ice block was manually dropped into designated feed bins and pigs consumed feed by natural feeding behaviour. After challenge, samples were collected at the pen level (feed troughs, oral fluids) and at the animal level (clinical signs, viral infection, growth rate, and mortality) across five independent experiments involving 15 additives. In 14 of the additives tested, pigs on supplemented diets had significantly greater average daily gain (ADG), significantly lower clinical signs and infection levels, and numerically lower mortality rates compared to non-supplemented controls. In conclusion, the majority of the additives evaluated mitigated the effects of PRRSV 174, PEDV and SVA in contaminated feed, resulting in improved health and performance.

Indexed as

Food AdditivesAnimal FeedAnimalsNorth AmericaPorcine epidemic diarrhea virusPorcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virusSwineSwine DiseasesVirus DiseasesVirusesFood Additivesanimal feedfeed mitigationice-block challengeswine viral diseases

Identifiers

PMID32706431
PMCPMC8247034
OpenAlexW3044069041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.