Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32706316›Full record

ArticleGM crops & food2020

Environmental impacts of genetically modified (GM) crop use 1996-2018: impacts on pesticide use and carbon emissions.

Graham Brookes, Peter Barfoot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GM crops & food, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Genetically engineered eucalyptus expressing pesticidal proteins fromFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  20. Genetically Engineered Microorganisms and Their Impact on Human Health.International journal of clinical practice · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Graham BrookesPG Economics , Dorchester, UK.
Peter BarfootPG Economics , Dorchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0081-7275

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper updates previous assessments of the environmental impacts associated with using crop biotechnology (specifically genetically modified crops) in global agriculture. It focuses on the environmental impacts associated with changes in pesticide use and greenhouse gas emissions arising from the use of GM crops since their first widespread commercial use 22 years ago. The adoption of GM insect resistant and herbicide tolerant technology has reduced pesticide spraying by 775.4 million kg (8.3%) and, as a result, decreased the environmental impact associated with herbicide and insecticide use on these crops (as measured by the indicator, the Environmental Impact Quotient (EIQ)) by 18.5%. The technology has also facilitated important cuts in fuel use and tillage changes, resulting in a significant reduction in the release of greenhouse gas emissions from the GM cropping area. In 2018, this was equivalent to removing 15.27 million cars from the roads.

Indexed as

PesticidesAgricultureAnimalsCarbonCrops, AgriculturalEnvironmentGreenhouse EffectPlants, Genetically ModifiedCarbonPesticidesactive ingredientbiotech cropscarbon sequestrationenvironmental impact quotientGMOno tillagepesticide

Identifiers

PMID32706316
PMCPMC7518756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.