Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32706025›Full record

ArticleBioscience reports2020

Comparison of a novel cholesterol efflux assay using immobilized liposome-bound gel beads with the conventional method.

Yuna Horiuchi, Shao-Jui Lai, Takahiro Kameda, Minoru Tozuka, Ryunosuke Ohkawa

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review of methods for the determination of cellular cholesterol content: principles, advantages, limitations, applications, and perspectives.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Can "Bad" HDL Be Turned Good Again?Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuna HoriuchiAnalytical Laboratory Chemistry, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan.
Shao-Jui LaiAnalytical Laboratory Chemistry, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan.
Takahiro KamedaAnalytical Laboratory Chemistry, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan.
Minoru TozukaAnalytical Laboratory Chemistry, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan.
Ryunosuke OhkawaAnalytical Laboratory Chemistry, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan.
Tokyo Medical and Dental University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cholesterol efflux capacity (CEC) is an atheroprotective function of high-density lipoprotein (HDL). CEC is currently measured using artificially prepared foam cells composed of cultured macrophage and 3H-cholesterol. However, this conventional method is not suitable for clinical laboratory use due to poor repeatability, complexity, and low safety. Recently, we reported a novel CEC assay, called the immobilized liposome-bound gel beads (ILG) method. The ILG method is an alternative to foam cells, comprising gel beads and 4,4-diflioro-4-bora-3a,4a-s-indacene labeled cholesterol (BODIPY-cholesterol) instead of macrophage and 3H-cholesterol, respectively. The ILG method has shown adequate basic properties and strong correlation with the conventional method. Here, we aimed to compare this new ILG method with the conventional method in-depth. When apoB-depleted serum was used as the cholesterol acceptor (CA), the ILG method had far better reproducibility than the conventional method. The CEC of major HDL subclasses HDL2 and HDL3 had similar results in both the ILG and conventional method. However, the ILG method did not reflect the CEC of apolipoprotein (apo) A-I and a minor HDL subclass which uses ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 on foam cells. Superior reproducibility of the ILG method, which is a limitation of the conventional method, and similar CEC results for major HDL subclasses in the ILG and conventional methods, provide further evidence that the ILG method is promising for measuring CEC clinically. However, some HDL subclasses or apo might have poor CEC correlation between these methods. Further research is therefore needed to confirm the clinical significance of estimating CEC by the ILG method.

Indexed as

Biological AssayApolipoprotein A-IApolipoprotein B-100Apolipoproteins EATP Binding Cassette Transporter 1Biological TransportCholesterol, HDLFoam CellsHumansLiposomesPorphobilinogenReproducibility of ResultsTHP-1 Cells3-anilino difluoroboron dipyrrometheneABCA1 protein, humanAPOA1 protein, humanAPOB protein, humanApoE protein, humanApolipoprotein A-IApolipoprotein B-100Apolipoproteins EATP Binding Cassette Transporter 1Cholesterol, HDLLiposomesPorphobilinogenapolipoproteinA-Icholesterol efflux capacityhigh-density lipoproteinimmobilized liposome-bound gel beads

Identifiers

PMID32706025
PMCPMC7403950
OpenAlexW3045071371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.