ArticleJournal of child neurology2020
The Neurodevelopmental and Motor Phenotype of SCA21 (ATX-TMEM240).
Article in Journal of child neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep brain stimulation for arm tremor: one-year blinded follow-up of a randomized trial.Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- How Early Should I Refer My Patient? The Benefits of a Quick Ophthalmic Referral in Spinocerebellar Ataxias, a Case Series and Literature Review.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Dystonic Tremor as Main Clinical Manifestation of SCA21.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2024Article
- Qualitative Insights into Key Angelman Syndrome Motor Related Concepts Reported by Caregivers-A Thematic Analysis of Semi-Structured Interviews.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Quantitative measures of motor development in Angelman syndrome.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2023Article
- On Spinocerebellar Ataxia 21 as a Mimicker of Cerebral Palsy.Neurology. Genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spinocerebellar ataxia type 21 (SCA21/ATX-TMEM240) is a rare form of cerebellar ataxia that commonly presents with motor, cognitive, and behavioral impairments. Although these features have been identified as part of the clinical manifestations of SCA21, the neurodevelopmental disorders associated with SCA21 have not been well studied or described. Here we present extensive phenotypic data for 3 subjects from an SCA21 family in the United States. Genetic testing demonstrated the c.196 G>A (p.Gly66Arg) variant to be a second recurrent mutation associated with the disorder. Standardized developmental assessment revealed significant deficits in cognition, adaptive function, motor skills, and social communication with 2 of the subjects having diagnoses of autism spectrum disorder, which has never been described in SCA21. Quantitative gait analysis showed markedly abnormal spatiotemporal gait variables indicative of poor gait control and cerebellar as well as noncerebellar dysfunction. Clinical evaluation also highlighted a striking variability in clinical symptoms, with greater ataxia correlating with greater severity of neurodevelopmental disorder diagnoses. Notably, neurodevelopmental outcomes have improved with intervention over time. Taken together, this case series identifies that the manifestation of neurodevelopmental disorders is a key feature of SCA21 and may precede the presence of motor abnormalities. Furthermore, the coexistence of ataxia and neurodevelopmental disorders in these subjects suggests a role for spinocerebellar pathways in both outcomes. The findings in this study highlight the importance of evaluation of neurodevelopmental concerns in the context of progressive motor abnormalities and the need for timely intervention to ultimately improve quality of life for individuals with SCA21.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.