ArticleJournal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society2021
Reliability and Validity of the Resident Satisfaction Index in Assisted Living.
Article in Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding satisfaction with assisted living (AL) from the residents' perspective is essential for creating supportive environments that are targeted toward the needs and desires of residents. Few measures have been tested to evaluate residents' satisfaction with AL. This study tested the reliability and validity of the Resident Satisfaction Index (RSI) in a sample of 501 AL residents. Based on Rasch analysis, there was support for item reliability and construct validity. Differential item functional (DIF) analysis was done to examine differences in item responses by age, gender, and cognition. Significant and substantive differences were identified for five items by gender, one item by cognition, and no differences were found by age group. Findings suggest the RSI is a reliable and valid measure to assess residents' satisfaction with AL and can be used to guide administrators and clinicians in making changes in these settings to increase residents' satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.