Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32705903›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2021

Hybrid Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Short-Term Complications, Reoperations, and Readmissions.

Venkat Boddapati, Nathan J Lee, Justin Mathew, Meghana M Vulapalli, Joseph M Lombardi, Marc D Dyrszka, Zeeshan M Sardar, Ronald A Lehman, K Daniel Riew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Could the different surgical goals of fusion and non-fusion also be achieved in combination within the same patient? Clinical and radiological outcome of hybrid cervical spine surgery.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Venkat BoddapatiThe Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3333-2234
Nathan J LeeThe Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Justin MathewThe Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-780X
Meghana M VulapalliThe Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Joseph M LombardiThe Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Marc D DyrszkaThe Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Zeeshan M SardarThe Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Ronald A LehmanThe Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
K Daniel RiewThe Spine Hospital, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designRetrospective cohort study.

objectivesAlthough cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has become a well-established and effective treatment for symptomatic cervical degeneration, many patients with multilevel disease are not good candidates for CDA at all levels. For such patients, hybrid surgery (HS)-a combination of adjacent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and CDA-may be more appropriate. Given the novelty of HS and the relative dearth of studies adequately assessing short-term perioperative complications, this current study sought to assess the short-term morbidity profile of HS, differences in operative duration, length of stay (LOS), and readmission and reoperation rates and reasons relative to a 2-level ACDF cohort.

methodsAll patients who underwent HS and 2-level ACDF were identified between 2011 and 2018 using a large, prospectively collected registry. Baseline patient characteristics and postoperative complications were compared using bivariate and/or multivariate analysis.

resultsA total of 390 patients undergoing HS were identified. Two-level procedures were the most common (74.9%). Patients undergoing HS were more likely to be younger, male, and have fewer comorbidities. There were no differences between HS and 2-level ACDF in rates of any postoperative complication, transfusion, readmissions, and operative duration. However, HS had a decreased LOS (0.5 days), relative to a 2-level ACDF. HS patients had low rates of reoperation (1.28%) with 1 case for hematoma evacuation and another for revision CDA.

conclusionsThis study represents one of the largest cohorts of patients undergoing HS reported to date. Patients undergoing HS are not at increased risk of perioperative complications relative to a 2-level ACDF and may benefit from shorter LOS.

Indexed as

ACDFanterior cervical discectomy and fusionCDAcervical disc arthroplastycervical spinecomplicationshybrid surgeryoutcomes

Identifiers

PMID32705903
PMCPMC8453682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.