ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2020
Resilience of perceptual metacognition in a dual-task paradigm.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Confidence in visual motion discrimination is preserved in individuals with schizophrenia.Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN · 2021Trial
- Neural correlates of attentional switching dysfunction in major depressive disorder: Evidence from an event-related potential study with a dual-task paradigm.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- A comprehensive assessment of current methods for measuring metacognition.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Metacognition in putative magno- and parvocellular vision.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2025Article
- Longitudinal study of metacognition's role in self-efficacy and hope development.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Can you accurately monitor your behaviors while multitasking? The effect of multitasking on metacognition.Psychological research · 2024Article
- Media Multitasking in Mixed Reality Learning Situations: What Determines Its Effectiveness?Psychology in Russia : state of the art · 2023Article
- Consensus Goals in the Field of Visual Metacognition.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022Article
- Multitasking costs on metacognition in a triple-task paradigm.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2021Article
- Measuring metacognitive performance: type 1 performance dependence and test-retest reliability.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2021Article
- Sources of Metacognitive Inefficiency.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When people do multiple tasks at the same time, it is often found that their performance is worse relative to when they do those same tasks in isolation. However, one aspect that has received little empirical attention is whether the ability to monitor and evaluate one's task performance is also affected by multitasking. How does dual-tasking affect metacognition and its relation to performance? We investigated this question through the use of a visual dual-task paradigm with confidence judgments. Participants categorized both the color and the motion direction of moving dots, and then rated their confidence in both responses. Across four experiments, participants (N = 87) exhibited a clear dual-task cost at the perceptual level, but no cost at the metacognitive level. We discuss this resilience of metacognition to multitasking costs, and examine how our results fit onto current models of perceptual metacognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32705620What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.