Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32705576›Full record

ArticleRheumatology and therapy2020

The Value of Screening for Celiac Disease in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Single Experience of a Tertiary Medical Center.

Fahidah AlEnzi, Mada Yateem, Manal Shaikh, Fahad AlSohaibani, Badryah Alhaymouni, AlShaikh Ahmed, Sulaiman M Al-Mayouf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fahidah AlEnziClinical Sciences, College of Medicine, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Fmalenzi@pnu.edu.sa.
Mada YateemPediatric Rheumatology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Manal ShaikhPediatric Rheumatology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fahad AlSohaibaniAdult Gastroenterology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Badryah AlhaymouniAdult Rheumatology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
AlShaikh AhmedAdult Rheumatology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sulaiman M Al-MayoufPediatric Rheumatology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SAPrincess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multi-organ inflammatory disease associated with autoimmune diseases. The aim of the study is to assessed the frequency of celiac disease (CD) in adults and children with SLE (aSLE and cSLE, respectively) and compare them with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients; the study also explored the clinical impact of CD serologic markers on SLE disease activity and severity.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study. Patients with SLE who had regular follow-up in rheumatology clinics were evaluated for laboratory and clinical variables using serology and the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI). To assess the occurrence of CD serology in cSLE and aSLE and the clinical impact of CD serologic markers on SLE, patients were tested for antigliadin (AGA), anti-endomysium (EmA) and anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibodies. RA and JIA patients were included for comparison. Duodenal biopsy was conducted in patients who exhibited CD markers.

resultsThe CD marker was found in 29 (11.6%) of the 250 patients. AGA was present in seven aSLE patients and tTG in two (11.1%). Among cSLE patients, the autoantibody was present in 17.6% (AGA in four, tTG in two, and EmA in three). For RA patients, five had AGA and tTG and one had EmA, with an overall positivity of 9.7%. Five JIA patients had AGA (four with EmA and five with tTG) with overall positivity of 10.9%; the serum IgA level was normal in all patients except one. Duodenal endoscopic biopsy was performed in patients with positive CD markers (two declined). Histologic confirmation of CD was reported in one RA and one JIA patient but in none of the SLE patients. There was no correlation between the presence of CD markers and autoantibodies in SLE.

conclusionCD antibodies did not influence SLE activity. Thus, SLE patients may not need to be screened for CD antibodies.

Indexed as

Celiac diseaseJuvenile idiopathic arthritisRheumatoid arthritisSystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID32705576
PMCPMC7410907
OpenAlexW3043981951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.