ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2021
Unexpected deposits in the anesthetic circuit: a possible cause of PEEP/Pmax valve malfunction.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PEEP is regulated by the internal PEEP/maximum peak inspiratory pressure limit (Pmax) valve. Malfunctioning of the PEEP/Pmax valve can result in the creation of unintentional or unstable PEEP, and a reduction of inspired tidal volume. Some of our Dräger Fabius® anesthesia machines were noted to exhibit changes in expiratory waveforms and unstable PEEP during general anesthesia. We considered that the cause was associated with PEEP/Pmax valve malfunction, and then investigated the problems in collaboration with the manufacturer. Seven of the 22 Dräger Fabius® anesthesia workstations at our department exhibited problems with their PEEP/Pmax valves. We replaced the PEEP membrane and sealing washers in these seven anesthesia machines, and the problems were temporarily resolved. After a short interval, however, one of the seven machines began to show a similar phenomenon. We then asked the manufacturer to overhaul the PEEP/Pmax valve and the entire breathing circuit of the machine. On close investigation, we found that the valve components and the internal surface of the breathing circuit were contaminated with unexpected deposits. The build-up of deposits occurred within a year after the previous regular inspection. Our troubleshooting process determined the issue with the PEEP/Pmax valve, which could go unnoticed because the valve is encased inside the breathing circuit, and requires disassembly for close inspection. Our findings should raise awareness regarding the importance of the preventive maintenance cycle as a safety precaution to keep the anesthetic circuit free of unexpected contamination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32705442What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.