ArticleJournal of digital imaging2020
Identification of Retinal Ganglion Cells from β-III Stained Fluorescent Microscopic Images.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optic nerve crush in mouse model is widely used for investigating the course following retinal ganglion cell (RGCs) injury. Manual cell counting from β-III tubulin stained microscopic images has been routinely performed to monitor RGCs after an optic nerve crush injury, but is time-consuming and prone to observer variability. This paper describes an automatic technique for RGC identification. We developed and validated (i) a sensitive cell candidate segmentation scheme and (ii) a classifier that removed false positives while retaining true positives. Two major contributions were made in cell candidate segmentation. First, a homomorphic filter was designed to adjust for the inhomogeneous illumination caused by uneven penetration of β-III tubulin antibody. Second, the optimal segmentation parameters for cell detection are highly image-specific. To address this issue, we introduced an offline-online parameter tuning approach. Offline tuning optimized model parameters based on training images and online tuning further optimized the parameters at the testing stage without needing access to the ground truth. In the cell identification stage, 31 geometric, statistical and textural features were extracted from each segmented cell candidate, which was subsequently classified as true or false positives by support vector machine. The homomorphic filter and the online parameter tuning approach together increased cell recall by 28%. The entire pipeline attained a recall, precision and coefficient of determination (r
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.