ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2021
Mid- to long-term outcome in patients treated with a mini-open sinus-tarsi approach for calcaneal fractures.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Single-stage arthrodesis for septic arthritis of the ankle and hindfoot].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2026Article
- Pedobarographic evaluation of five commonly used orthoses for the lower extremity.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
- A windows technique for sustentaculum tali screw fixation using the sinus tarsi approach for calcaneal fractures: a cadaveric study.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile the extended lateral approach was the gold standard for treatment of calcaneal fractures for decades, the mini-open approach through the sinus tarsi gained popularity in recent years. Although widely used, there are only a few reports available in the literature reporting on mid- to long-term results. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to report on mid- to long-term radiographic and clinical outcomes of calcaneal fractures treated surgically using a mini-open sinus tarsi approach. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective review, radiographic and clinical outcome measures of 30 consecutive patients (34 fractures) were analyzed. Conventional radiographs were used to measure the Boehler's angle before and after surgical fixation. Computed tomography (CT) scans were analyzed to distinguish between joint depression and tongue-type calcaneal fractures. Each calcaneal fracture was additionally categorized according to the Sanders classification. The clinical outcome was measured using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (very unsatisfied) to 4 (very satisfied), the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, and the Maryland Foot Score.
resultsThe Boehler's angle improved from 12.6 degrees preoperatively to 26.3 degrees postoperatively (P < 0.001). Loss of sagittal reduction (i.e., a decline of the Boehler's angle of > 5 degrees) from postoperative to the last follow-up was evident in nine (26%) fractures. Out of 29 patients with an available satisfaction score, 20 (69%) were very satisfied, 8 (28%) were satisfied, and one (3%) was moderately satisfied. Satisfaction at the last follow-up declined with higher age at surgery. An overall low complication rate was evident, with painful hardware needing removal being the most common complication.
conclusionsApproaching calcaneus fractures through the sinus tarsi provides satisfactory mid- to long-term radiographic and clinical outcomes, independent of the severity of the fractures according to the Sanders classification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Retrospective Case Series.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32705382What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.