ArticleHistochemistry and cell biology2020
Molecular differences between arterial and venous grafts in the first year after coronary artery bypass grafting.
Article in Histochemistry and cell biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Exacerbating Effects of the Tumor Necrosis Factor in Cardiovascular Stenosis: Intimal Hyperplasia.Cancers · 2024Review
- In focus in HCB.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite commonly used for coronary artery bypass surgery, saphenous vein (SV) grafts have significantly lower patency rates in comparison to internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafts, which might be due to the structural characteristics of the vessel wall but also due to differences in oxidative stress adaptation and molecular signaling and regulation. This human post mortem study included a total of 150 human bypass grafts (75 SV grafts and 75 ITA grafts) obtained from 60 patients divided into five groups due to the time period of implantation: group 1: baseline group without grafting; group 2: 1 day; group 3: > 1 day-1 week; group 4: > 1 week-1 month; group 5: > 1 month-1 year. Pieces of 3 mm length were fixed with formaldehyde, dehydrated, wax embedded, cut into sections of 3 µm thickness, and histologically and immunohistochemically examined. Over the whole time period, we observed a lower neointima formation and a better preserved media in ITA grafts with a higher percentage of TNF-α, PDGFR-α, and VEGF-A in nearly all vessel wall layers, a higher amount of MMP-7, MMP-9, EGFR, and bFGF positive cells in SV grafts and a timely different peak not only between ITA and SV grafts but also within the various vessel wall layers of both graft types. Since most of the examined growth factors, growth factor receptors and cytokines are regulated by MAPKs, our results suggest an activation of different pathways in both vessel graft types immediately after bypass grafting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.