Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32705301›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2021

The value of chest and skeletal staging in parosteal osteosarcoma: two-centre experience and literature review.

R Rajakulasingam, V Attard, R Botchu, S L James, A Saifuddin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

R RajakulasingamDepartment of Medical Imaging, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Brockley Hill, Stanmore, Middlesex, HA7 4LP, UK. Ramanan.rajakulasingam1@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8002-2108
V AttardDepartment of Medical Imaging, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, MSD, 2090, Malta.
R BotchuDepartment of Medical Imaging, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, The Woodlands, Bristol Road South, Birmingham, B31 2AP, UK.
S L JamesDepartment of Medical Imaging, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, The Woodlands, Bristol Road South, Birmingham, B31 2AP, UK.
A SaifuddinDepartment of Medical Imaging, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Brockley Hill, Stanmore, Middlesex, HA7 4LP, UK.
Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital · GBRoyal Orthopaedic Hospital · GBMater Dei Hospital · MT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the value of chest and skeletal staging in patients with parosteal osteosarcoma (POS), and the incidence of late local and chest recurrence. MATERIALS AND

methodsRetrospective review of patients across two institutions with histological confirmation of POS diagnosed between January 2007 and March 2020. Data collected included age, sex, skeletal location, results of chest CT and whole-body bone scintigraphy (WB-BSc) or whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) obtained at initial diagnosis. The histological tumour grade based on surgical resection specimens was classified as low-grade POS (LG-POS) and dedifferentiated POS (DD-POS). Findings of chest CT and skeletal staging were correlated with tumour grade. Follow-up chest CT and MRI studies were reviewed to determine the rate of late lung metastases and local recurrence.

resultsThere were 27 males and 44 females, mean age 33 years (range 12-79 years). The femur (n = 43) and tibia (n = 14) were the most commonly involved bones. From surgical resection histology, 42 (59.2%) were LG-POS and 29 (40.8%) were DD-POS. WB-BSc/WB-MRI showed no skeletal metastases, while 1 case of DD-POS presented with bilateral calcified lung metastases. At follow-up, 7 patients (9.9%) developed lung metastases (mean of 18.9 months, range 10-48 months) from initial presentation, of which all were DD-POS. All but 1 patient who developed subsequent lung metastases had a local recurrence.

conclusionsSkeletal staging is unlikely to be of value in POS. Staging chest CT is very unlikely to demonstrate lung metastases in LG-POS and could be limited to DD-POS, particularly at the time of local recurrence.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsOsteosarcoma, JuxtacorticalAdolescentAdultAgedChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesWhole Body ImagingYoung AdultChest CTParosteal osteosarcomaWhole-body bone scintigraphyWhole-body MRI

Identifiers

PMID32705301
OpenAlexW3044404516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.