ArticleDer Nervenarzt2020
[Irreversible loss of brain function-Part 1: pitfalls in clinical diagnosis].
Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A significant change in the fourth update of the German guidelines on determining brain death is that it includes an explicit profile of requirements on physicians involved in ILBF diagnosis. These requisite qualification criteria have also been formulated due to the fact that, in many hospitals, ILBF diagnosis is only rarely carried out and, as a result, uncertainty frequently arises. Typical difficulties emerge at all stages of ILBF diagnosis, and numerous relevant pitfalls arise that need to be taken into consideration and which might also be relevant in the selection of the method(s) to detect irreversibility. The approaches presented here are suited to achieving a valid result in the evaluation of equivocal ILBF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32705299What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.