Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32704981›Full record

ArticleTranslational animal science2020

In vitro evaluation of

Hugo F Monteiro, Ana Laura J Lelis, Virginia L N Brandao, Andressa Faccenda, Andre S Avila, Jose Arce-Cordero, Lorrayny G Silva, Xiaoxia Dai, Rasiel Restelatto, Perivaldo Carvalho and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational animal science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Roughage to Concentrate Ratio andVeterinary sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Hugo F MonteiroDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Ana Laura J LelisDepartamento de Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga, SP, Brazil.
Virginia L N BrandaoDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.ORCID 0000-0002-7413-9676
Andressa FaccendaDepartamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual de Maringa, Maringa, PR, Brazil.
Andre S AvilaDepartamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Parana, Marechal Candido Rondon, PR, Brazil.
Jose Arce-CorderoDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Lorrayny G SilvaCentro APTA Bovinos de Corte, Instituto de Zootecnia, Sertaozinho, SP, Brazil.
Xiaoxia DaiDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Rasiel RestelattoDepartamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal do Parana, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Perivaldo CarvalhoDepartamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso, Cuiaba, MT, Brazil.
Leni R LimaDepartamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso, Cuiaba, MT, Brazil.
Antonio P FaciolaDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.ORCID 0000-0003-0935-6233
University of Florida · USUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso · BRInstitute of Animal Science and Pastures · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual de Maringá · BRUniversidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná · BRUniversidade Federal do Paraná · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives of this study were: 1) to compare the effects of live yeast (LY), yeast fermentation product (YFP), a mix of

Indexed as

gas productionLactobacillus acidophilusLactobacillus plantarumSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID32704981
PMCPMC6994042
OpenAlexW2995900142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.