Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32704626›Full record

ArticleTranslational animal science2017

Fetal and organ development at gestational days 45, 90, 135 and at birth of lambs exposed to under- or over-nutrition during gestation

S M Pillai, A K Jones, M L Hoffman, K K McFadden, S A Reed, S A Zinn, K E Govoni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational animal science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Welfare of small ruminants during transport.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. DietaryAnimal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S M PillaiDepartment of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs 06269.
A K JonesDepartment of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs 06269.
M L HoffmanDepartment of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs 06269.
K K McFaddenDepartment of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs 06269.
S A ReedDepartment of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs 06269.
S A ZinnDepartment of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs 06269.
K E GovoniDepartment of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs 06269.
University of Connecticut · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine the effects of poor maternal nutrition on offspring body and organ growth during gestation, pregnant Western White-faced ewes (n = 82) were randomly assigned into a 3 × 4 factorial treatment structure at d 30.2 ± 0.2 of gestation (n = 5 to 7 ewes per treatment). Ewes were individually fed 100% (control), 60% (restricted) or 140% (over) of NRC requirements for TDN. Ewes were euthanized at d 45, 90 or 135 of gestation or underwent parturition (birth) and tissues were collected from the offspring (n = 10 to 15 offspring per treatment). Offspring from control, restricted and overfed ewes are referred to as CON, RES and OVER, respectively. Ewe data were analyzed as a completely randomized design and offspring data were analyzed as a split-plot design using PROC MIXED. Ewe BW did not differ at d 30 (P ≥ 0.43), however restricted ewes weighed less than overfed and overfed were heavier than controls at d 45, and restricted weighed less and overfed were heavier than controls at d 90 and 135 and birth (P ≤ 0.05). Ewe BCS was similar at d 30, 45 and 90 (P ≤ 0.07), however restricted ewes scored lower than control at d 135 and birth (P ≤ 0.05) and over ewes scored higher than control at d 135 (P ≤ 0.05) but not at birth (P = 0.06). A maternal diet by day of gestation interaction indicated that at birth the body weight (BW) of RES offspring was less than CON and OVER (P ≤ 0.04) and heart girth of RES was smaller than CON and OVER (P ≤ 0.004). There was no interaction of maternal diet and day of gestation on crown-rump, fetal, or nose occipital length, or orbit or umbilical diam. (P ≥ 0.31). A main effect of maternal diet indicated that the RES crown-rump length was shorter than CON and OVER (P ≤ 0.05). An interaction was observed for liver, kidney and renal fat (P ≤ 0.02). At d 45 the liver of RES offspring was larger than CON and OVER (P ≤ 0.002), but no differences observed at d 90, 135 or birth (P ≥ 0.07). At d 45, the kidneys of OVER offspring were larger than CON and RES (P ≤ 0.04), but no differences observed at d 90, 135 or birth (P ≥ 0.60). At d 135, OVER had more perirenal fat than CON and RES (P ≤ 0.03), and at birth RES had more perirenal fat than CON and OVER (P ≤ 0.04). There was no interaction observed for offspring heart weight, length or width, kidney length, adrenal gland weight, loin eye area or rib width (P ≥ 0.09). In conclusion, poor maternal nutrition differentially alters offspring body size and organ growth depending on the stage of gestation.

Indexed as

fetusgestationmaternal nutritionorganssheep

Identifiers

PMID32704626
PMCPMC7235467
OpenAlexW2609875410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.