Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32704588›Full record

ArticleAEM education and training2020

Which Applicant Factors Predict Success in Emergency Medicine Training Programs? A Scoping Review.

Allen Yang, Chris Gilani, Soheil Saadat, Linda Murphy, Shannon Toohey, Megan Boysen-Osborn

Open access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in AEM education and training, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Metrics of Resident Achievement for Defining Program Aims.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Allen YangDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of California, Irvine Irvine CA.
Chris GilaniDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of California, Irvine Irvine CA.
Soheil SaadatDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of California, Irvine Irvine CA.
Linda MurphyHealth Science Library Orange University of California, Irvine Irvine CA.
Shannon TooheyDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of California, Irvine Irvine CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1887-633X
Megan Boysen-OsbornDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of California, Irvine Irvine CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6676-6429
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProgram directors (PDs) in emergency medicine (EM) receive an abundance of applications for very few residency training spots. It is unclear which selection strategies will yield the most successful residents. Many authors have attempted to determine which items in an applicant's file predict future performance in EM.

objectivesThe purpose of this scoping review is to examine the breadth of evidence related to the predictive value of selection factors for performance in EM residency.

methodsThe authors systematically searched four databases and websites for peer-reviewed and gray literature related to EM admissions published between 1992 and February 2019. Two reviewers screened titles and abstracts for articles that met the inclusion criteria, according to the scoping review study protocol. The authors included studies if they specifically examined selection factors and whether those factors predicted performance in EM residency training in the United States.

resultsAfter screening 23,243 records, the authors selected 60 for full review. From these, the authors selected 15 published manuscripts, one unpublished manuscript, and 11 abstracts for inclusion in the review. These studies examined the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE), Standardized Letters of Evaluation, Medical Student Performance Evaluation, medical school attended, clerkship grades, membership in honor societies, and other less common factors and their association with future EM residency training performance.

conclusionsThe USMLE was the most common factor studied. It unreliably predicts clinical performance, but more reliably predicts performance on licensing examinations. All other factors were less commonly studied and, similar to the USMLE, yielded mixed results.

Identifiers

PMID32704588
PMCPMC7369487
OpenAlexW2983476074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.