Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32704414›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2020

Explainable Machine Learning Approach as a Tool to Understand Factors Used to Select the Refractive Surgery Technique on the Expert Level.

Tae Keun Yoo, Ik Hee Ryu, Hannuy Choi, Jin Kuk Kim, In Sik Lee, Jung Sub Kim, Geunyoung Lee, Tyler Hyungtaek Rim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. [Optimization of Comprehensive Prevention and Control Strategies for Myopia From the Persepctive of the Social Ecological Systems Theory].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Artificial intelligence in the anterior segment of eye diseases.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tae Keun YooDepartment of Ophthalmology, Aerospace Medical Center, Republic of Korea Air Force, Cheongju, South Korea.
Ik Hee RyuB&VIIT Eye Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Hannuy ChoiB&VIIT Eye Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Jin Kuk KimB&VIIT Eye Center, Seoul, South Korea.
In Sik LeeB&VIIT Eye Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Jung Sub KimB&VIIT Eye Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Geunyoung LeeMediWhale, Seoul, South Korea.
Tyler Hyungtaek RimSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Recently, laser refractive surgery options, including laser epithelial keratomileusis, laser in situ keratomileusis, and small incision lenticule extraction, successfully improved patients' quality of life. Evidence-based recommendation for an optimal surgery technique is valuable in increasing patient satisfaction. We developed an interpretable multiclass machine learning model that selects the laser surgery option on the expert level. Methods: A multiclass XGBoost model was constructed to classify patients into four categories including laser epithelial keratomileusis, laser in situ keratomileusis, small incision lenticule extraction, and contraindication groups. The analysis included 18,480 subjects who intended to undergo refractive surgery at the B&VIIT Eye center. Training (n = 10,561) and internal validation (n = 2640) were performed using subjects who visited between 2016 and 2017. The model was trained based on clinical decisions of highly experienced experts and ophthalmic measurements. External validation (n = 5279) was conducted using subjects who visited in 2018. The SHapley Additive ex-Planations technique was adopted to explain the output of the XGBoost model. Results: The multiclass XGBoost model exhibited an accuracy of 81.0% and 78.9% when tested on the internal and external validation datasets, respectively. The SHapley Additive ex-Planations explanations for the results were consistent with prior knowledge from ophthalmologists. The explanation from one-versus-one and one-versus-rest XGBoost classifiers was effective for easily understanding users in the multicategorical classification problem. Conclusions: This study suggests an expert-level multiclass machine learning model for selecting the refractive surgery for patients. It also provided a clinical understanding in a multiclass problem based on an explainable artificial intelligence technique. Translational Relevance: Explainable machine learning exhibits a promising future for increasing the practical use of artificial intelligence in ophthalmic clinics.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceKeratomileusis, Laser In SituMyopiaAdultFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleQuality of LifeYoung Adultcorneal laser surgeryexplainable machine learningmulticlass classificationrefractive surgery

Identifiers

PMID32704414
PMCPMC7346876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.