Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32704309›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2017

Risk for the development of Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) due to feeding of calves with milk containing residues of antibiotics.

EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), Antonia Ricci, Ana Allende, Declan Bolton, Marianne Chemaly, Robert Davies, Pablo Salvador Fernández Escámez, Rosina Girones, Kostas Koutsoumanis, Roland Lindqvist and 22 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Heat Inactivation of Methicillin-ResistantAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)
Antonia Ricci
Ana Allende
Declan Bolton
Marianne Chemaly
Robert Davies
Pablo Salvador Fernández Escámez
Rosina Girones
Kostas Koutsoumanis
Roland Lindqvist
Birgit Nørrung
Lucy Robertson
Giuseppe Ru
Moez Sanaa
Marion Simmons
Panagiotis Skandamis
Emma Snary
Niko Speybroeck
Benno Ter Kuile
John Threlfall
Helene Wahlström
Björn Bengtsson
Damien Bouchard
Luke Randall
Bernd-Alois Tenhagen
Eric Verdon
John Wallace
Rosella Brozzi
Beatriz Guerra
Ernesto Liebana
Pietro Stella
Lieve Herman
Agence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail · FREuropean Food Safety Authority · ITNational Influenza Center · MNScience et Technologie du Lait et de l'Oeuf · FRUniversitat de Barcelona · ESDépartement Santé Animale · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

EFSA was requested to: 1) assess the risk for the development of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) due to feeding on farm of calves with colostrum potentially containing residues of antibiotics; 2) assess the risk for the development of AMR due to feeding on farm of calves with milk of cows treated during lactation with an antibiotic and milked during the withdrawal period, and 3) propose possible options to mitigate the risk for the development of AMR derived from such practices. Treatment of dairy cows during the dry period and during lactation is common in the EU Member States. Penicillins, alone or in combination with aminoglycosides, and cephalosporins are most commonly used. Residue levels of antimicrobials decrease with the length of the dry period. When the interval from the start of the drying-off treatment until calving is as long as or longer than the minimum specified in the Summary of Product Characteristics of the antimicrobial, faecal shedding of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria will not increase when calves are fed colostrum from treated cows. Milk from cows receiving antimicrobial treatment during lactation contains substantial residues during the treatment and withdrawal period. Consumption of such milk will lead to increased faecal shedding of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria by calves. A range of possible options exist for restricting the feeding of such milk to calves, which could be targeting the highest priority critically important antimicrobials. β-Lactamases can reduce the concentration of β-lactams which are the most frequently used antimicrobials in milking cows. Options to mitigate the presence of resistant bacteria in raw milk or colostrum are mainly based on thermal inactivation.

Indexed as

antimicrobial residuesantimicrobial resistancecalvescolostrumwaste milk

Identifiers

PMID32704309
PMCPMC7372110
OpenAlexW2583066569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.