ArticleJournal of aerosol science2020
Behavior of Ultrafine Particles in Electro-Hydrodynamic Flow Induced by Corona Discharge.
Article in Journal of aerosol science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of aerosol persistence in ICUs via low-cost sensor network and zonal models.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Solid-phase excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy for chemical analysis of combustion aerosols.PloS one · 2021Article
- Article
- Analytical model for electrohydrodynamic thrust.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Ultrafine particle behavior in electro-hydrodynamic (EHD) flow induced by corona discharge is studied experimentally and numerically. The EHD flow serves as a primary particle aspiration/sampling mechanism, the collector does not require any additional flow generation. Multiphysics numerical model couples the ion transport equation and the Navier-Stokes equations (NSE) to solve for the spatiotemporal distribution of electric field, charge density, and flow field, the results are compared with experimental velocity profiles at the exit. The computed velocity and flow rate data are in good agreement with the experimental data; the maximum velocity is located at the axis and ranges from 1 m/s to 4 m/s as a function of corona voltage. Experimentally evaluated particle transmission trends for ambient and NaCl nanoparticles particles in the 20 nm - 150 nm range are in good agreement with the theoretical models. However, for particles in the 10 nm - 20 nm size range, the transmission is lower due to the increased particle charging resulted from their exposure to the high-intensity electric field and high charge density in the EHD driven flow. These conditions yield a high probability of particles below 20 nm to acquire and hold a unit charge. The transmission is lower for smaller particle (10 nm) due to their high charge to mass ratio, and it increases as the single-charged particles grow in mass up to 20 nm, resulting in their lower electrical mobility. For particles larger than 20 nm, the electrical mobility increases again as they can acquire multiple charges. The results shed insight into interaction of nanoparticle and ions in high electrical field environment, that occur in primary EHD driven flows and in the secondary flows generated by corona discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.