Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32704073›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2020

Leflunomide monotherapy versus combination therapy with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective study.

Daihua Deng, Jun Zhou, Min Li, Siyin Li, Lan Tian, Jinmei Zou, Tingting Wang, Jianhong Wu, Fanxin Zeng, Jing Yang

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daihua Deng *Department of Rheumatology, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, Sichuan, China.
Jun Zhou *Department of Clinical Research Center, Dazhou Central Hospital, No. 56 Nanyuemiao Street, Tongchuan District, Dazhou, Sichuan, China.
Min LiDepartment of Rheumatology, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, Sichuan, China.
Siyin LiDepartment of Rheumatology, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, Sichuan, China.
Lan TianDepartment of Rheumatology, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, Sichuan, China.
Jinmei ZouDepartment of Rheumatology, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, Sichuan, China.
Tingting WangDepartment of Rheumatology, Dazhou Central Hospital, Dazhou, Sichuan, China.
Jianhong WuDepartment of Rheumatology, Dazhou Central Hospital, Dazhou, Sichuan, China.
Fanxin ZengDepartment of Clinical Research Center, Dazhou Central Hospital, No. 56 Nanyuemiao Street, Tongchuan District, Dazhou, Sichuan, China. zengfx@pku.edu.cn.
Jing YangDepartment of Rheumatology, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, Sichuan, China. yangjing6525@163.com.
Mianyang Central Hospital · CNDazhou Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leflunomide (LEF) is a conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. However, there are few reports on the comparison of efficacy between LEF alone and combined with other csDMARDs. Here, the efficacy and safety of LEF monotherapy (88) and combination (361) therapy groups were evaluated. After 3 months, there were no significant differences in 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28), health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) between the monotherapy and combination groups (all P > 0.05). According to the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria, it was found that the DAS28 response rates were similar in the two groups (P > 0.05). Besides, the two groups presented similar safety profiles. Subgroup analysis found that there was no difference in efficacy among the three combined therapies (LEF + methotrexate (MTX), LEF + hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and LEF + MTX + HCQ) and LEF monotherapy. Furthermore, when the dose of LEF was less than 40 mg/day, no significant difference in efficacy was observed between low and high doses. Overall, these results indicated that low dose LEF monotherapy was not inferior to the combination therapy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansHydroxychloroquineLeflunomideMaleMethotrexateMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAntirheumatic AgentsHydroxychloroquineLeflunomideMethotrexate

Identifiers

PMID32704073
PMCPMC7378063
OpenAlexW3044426717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.