ArticleDiabetes care2020
Youth Involvement in the Decision to Start CGM Predicts Subsequent CGM Use.
Article in Diabetes care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Parent and adolescent perspectives on decision-making involvement: A qualitative comparison in sickle cell and diabetes clinics.Patient education and counseling · 2026Article
- 14. Children and Adolescents: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026.Diabetes care · 2026Review
- Correlates of youth involvement in decision making about growth hormone treatment.Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare · 2025Article
- Caregiver experiences of an integrative patient-centered digital health application for pediatric type 1 diabetes care: Findings from a pilot clinical trial.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Optimizing metabolic health with digital twins.npj aging · 2025Review
- Experience with burdens of diabetes device use that affect uptake and optimal use in people with type 1 diabetes.Endocrine connections · 2023Review
- Adolescent Decision-Making Involvement in the Receipt of Genomic Testing Results.The Journal of pediatrics · 2023Article
- Disparities in Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use Among Women of Reproductive Age with Type 1 Diabetes in the T1D Exchange.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2023Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Diabetes Device Adoption for People with Type 1 Diabetes.Current diabetes reports · 2022Review
- Young Children with Type 1 Diabetes: Recent Advances in Behavioral Research.Current diabetes reports · 2022Review
- Perspectives on Remote Glucose Monitoring in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2021Article
- "I Think Parents Shouldn't Be Too Pushy": A Qualitative Exploration of Parent and Youth Perspectives of Youth Decision-Making Involvement in Starting Continuous Glucose Monitoring.The science of diabetes self-management and care · 2021Article
- "I Didn't Really Have a Choice": Qualitative Analysis of Racial-Ethnic Disparities in Diabetes Technology Use Among Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2021Article
- Correlates of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use Trajectories in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2021Article
- Adolescent, Parent, and Clinician Perspectives on Increasing Adolescent Involvement in Decision-Making During Clinic Visits.Journal of pediatric health care : official publication of National Association of Pediatric Nurse Associates & PractitionersArticle
- Decision-Making Involvement, Self-Efficacy, and Transition Readiness in Youth With Sickle Cell Disease.Nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe ability of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to improve diabetes outcomes depends upon consistent use. To identify factors that facilitate long-term use of CGM, this study tested the hypothesis that youth involvement in the decision to initiate this therapy would influence subsequent CGM use and that CGM self-efficacy and satisfaction mediate this relationship. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsBefore initiating CGM, parent-youth dyads (i.e., pairs) from an academic endocrinology clinic completed assessments, including a measure of the child's involvement in the decision to start CGM. Two months into CGM use, youth completed measures of CGM self-efficacy and satisfaction. Fidelity of CGM use between weeks 5 and 12 was accessed via a cloud-based data repository. Hypotheses were tested with linear mixed-effects models, accounting for patients clustered within provider and repeated measures within patients.
resultsCGM use in 108 dyads (youth mean age 13.4 ± 2.7 years; 73% White) was positively predicted by baseline parent report of youth involvement in the CGM decision (
conclusionsTo achieve maximum clinical benefit from CGM use, providers should facilitate youth involvement in the decision to initiate the device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.