ArticleBiology of sex differences2020
The prognostic value of gender in gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a propensity score matching analysis.
Article in Biology of sex differences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Different outcomes by sex in metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients receiving imatinib: a trial-level analysis.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Current treatment and outcomes of pediatric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST): a systematic review of published studies.Pediatric surgery international · 2021Pooled it
- CT feature of irregular extensive ulceration as a predictor of liver metastasis in gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumours.European radiology · 2025Article
- Age-dependent diminution of female prognostic advantage in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective cohort analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Establishment and validation of a prognostic nomogram for extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Retrospective Study at a Tertiary Care Center in Saudi Arabia in the Last Decade.Cureus · 2024Article
- The impact of gender on survival outcomes in patients with small intestinal stromal tumors: a comprehensive analysis using the SEER database.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Effects of surgical management for gastrointestinal stromal tumor patients with liver metastasis on survival outcomes.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Review
- A radiomics-clinical combined nomogram-based on non-enhanced CT for discriminating the risk stratification in GISTs.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Bioinformatic analysis of KIT juxtamembrane domain mutations in Syrian GIST patients: jigsaw puzzle completed.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2023Article
- Metabolic Dysregulation Explains the Diverse Impacts of Obesity in Males and Females with Gastrointestinal Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Nomogram for Predicting Recurrence-Free Survival of Primary Localized Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Sex differences in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours: do they exist and does it affect survival?ESMO open · 2022Review
- Tensin2 Is a Novel Diagnostic Marker in GIST, Associated with Gastric Location and Non-Metastatic Tumors.Cancers · 2022Article
- The Number of Positive Tumor Markers (NPTM) Achieves Higher Value in the Prognosis Prediction of Gastric Cancer.Disease markers · 2022Article
- Primary Localized Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Medication Adherence and Prognosis According to Gender.Patient preference and adherence · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) of the stomach are the most common GISTs. The risk, incidence, and outcome of cancer are different between the sexes. Whether gender is related to the prognosis of gastric stromal tumors is unclear. Therefore, this study aims to explore the relationship between gender and gastric GIST prognosis.
methodsData from gastric GIST patients were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to reduce confounding factors, and the clinicopathological features and prognosis of GIST patients were comprehensively evaluated.
resultsThere were 512 male patients and 538 female patients with gastric GIST. The gender of gastric GIST patients was associated with marital status, surgical treatment, tumor size, and mitotic index (P < 0.05). The Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test revealed that male patients had a higher mortality rate than female patients (P = 0.0024). After matching all the potential confounding factors, the survival of the female gastric GIST patients was better than that of the male gastric GIST patients (P = 0.042). Cox regression analysis revealed that gender was an independent risk factor for overall survival. The risk of death was higher for males than for females (HR 1.677, 95% CI 1.150-2.444, P = 0.007).
conclusionGender could be a prognostic factor for gastric GIST survival, and male patients had a higher risk of death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.