Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32703267›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2020

The accuracy of preliminary diagnoses made by paramedics - a cross-sectional comparative study.

Outi Koivulahti, Miretta Tommila, Elina Haavisto

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Acil servis tanıları ile paramediklerin ilk değerlendirme tanılarının karşılaştırılması.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2024
    Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Outi KoivulahtiDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Department of Nursing Science 20014 University of Turku, Turku Finland and Satakunta Central Hospital, Sairaalantie 3, 28500, Pori, Finland. outi@koivulahti.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2008-0514
Miretta TommilaDepartment of Perioperative Services, Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Management, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, PO Box 52, 20521, Turku, Finland.
Elina HaavistoDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Department of Nursing Science 20014 University of Turku, Turku Finland and Satakunta Central Hospital, Sairaalantie 3, 28500, Pori, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical decision-making skills of paramedics have been emphasized because of the growing complexity of emergency medicine nursing. A preliminary diagnosis made by a paramedic has an essential role in directing the subsequent care. An accurate preliminary diagnosis improves the patient's outcome. The research in this area is relatively scarce and there are no previous studies in Finland describing the accuracy of preliminary diagnoses made by paramedics. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether paramedics are making accurate preliminary diagnoses for the patients they are transporting to hospital. In addition, the aim was to describe the variables related to an accurate preliminary diagnosis.

methodsA cross-sectional comparative approach was used and conducted through a questionnaire to gather data from the paramedics. A total of 71 paramedics participated in the study and 378 patient cases were included. The paramedics were asked to describe the basic information of a case, to state their preliminary diagnosis, and give their own educational background. The accuracy of the paramedic's preliminary diagnosis was compared with the discharge diagnosis of the ED physicians retrieved from hospital's patient records. Logistic regression analysis and a binomial test were used to test the statistical significance.

resultsThe agreement between the paramedics' preliminary diagnosis vs. hospital diagnosis was 70% (n = 261). Diagnostic accuracy varied according to the medical condition from mental diseases and intoxication (86%, p = 0,000), cerebral strokes (81%, p = 0,007) to infections (31% p = 0,029). The educational background of a bachelor-degree-level paramedic (p = 0,016, 95% Cl 1,7-139,6) and a good self-assessment value (p = 0,003, 95% Cl 1,2-2,7) were related to making a correct diagnosis.

conclusionsParamedics are able to determine preliminary diagnoses at satisfactory level. The relationship between educational background and diagnostic accuracy suggests that there is a definitive need for a specific pre-hospital nursing education.

Indexed as

Allied Health PersonnelDiagnosisEmergency Medical ServicesCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnostic ErrorsEducational StatusFinlandHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesClinical decision makingEmergency medicineParamedicPre-hospital nursePreliminary diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID32703267
PMCPMC7376915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.