Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32703240›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2020

imputeqc: an R package for assessing imputation quality of genotypes and optimizing imputation parameters.

Gennady V Khvorykh, Andrey V Khrunin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gennady V KhvorykhDepartment of Molecular Bases of Human Genetics, Institute of Molecular Genetics of Russian Academy of Sciences, 2 Kurchatov sq., Moscow, 123182, Russia. khvorykh@img.ras.ru.
Andrey V KhruninDepartment of Molecular Bases of Human Genetics, Institute of Molecular Genetics of Russian Academy of Sciences, 2 Kurchatov sq., Moscow, 123182, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe imputation of genotypes increases the power of genome-wide association studies. However, the imputation quality should be assessed in each particular case. Nevertheless, not all imputation softwares control the error of output, e.g., the last release of fastPHASE program (1.4.8) lacks such an option. In this particular software there is also an uncertainty in choosing the model parameters. fastPHASE is based on haplotype clusters, which size should be set a priori. The parameter influences the results of imputation and downstream analysis.

resultsWe present a software toolkit imputeqc to assess the imputation quality and/or to choose the model parameters for imputation. We demonstrate the efficacy of toolkit for evaluation of imputations made with both fastPHASE and BEAGLE software for HapMap and 1000 Genomes data. The discordance of genotypes received correlated well in both methods. Using imputeqc, we also shown how to choose the optimal number of haplotype clusters and expectation-maximization cycles for fastPHASE program. The found number of haplotype clusters of 25 was further applied for hapFLK testing that revealed signatures of selection at LCT region on chromosome 2. We also demonstrated how to decrease the computational time in the case of hapFLK testing from 3 days to 20 h.

conclusionsThe toolkit is implemented as an R package imputeqc and command line scripts. The code is freely available at https://github.com/inzilico/imputeqc under the MIT license.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudySoftwareChromosomes, HumanDatabases, GeneticGenome, HumanGenotypeHaplotypesHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSample SizeClusterGenotypeHaplotypeImputation quality

Identifiers

PMID32703240
PMCPMC7379353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.