Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32703210›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Surgery scheduling heuristic considering OR downstream and upstream facilities and resources.

Rafael Calegari, Flavio S Fogliatto, Filipe R Lucini, Michel J Anzanello, Beatriz D Schaan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rafael CalegariDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Osvaldo Aranha, 99, 5° andar, Porto Alegre, 90035-190, Brazil.
Flavio S FogliattoDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Osvaldo Aranha, 99, 5° andar, Porto Alegre, 90035-190, Brazil. ffogliatto@producao.ufrgs.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0323-8060
Filipe R LuciniDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr NW, AB, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N1, Canada.
Michel J AnzanelloDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Av. Osvaldo Aranha, 99, 5° andar, Porto Alegre, 90035-190, Brazil.
Beatriz D SchaanEndocrinology Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre / Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Av Ramiro Barcelos, 2350, 4° andar, Porto Alegre, 90035-903, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical theater (ST) operations planning is a key subject in the healthcare management literature, particularly the scheduling of procedures in operating rooms (ORs). The OR scheduling problem is usually approached using mathematical modeling and made available to ST managers through dedicated software. Regardless of the large body of knowledge on the subject, OR scheduling models rarely consider the integration of OR downstream and upstream facilities and resources or validate their propositions in real life, rather using simulated scenarios. We propose a heuristic to sequence surgeries that considers both upstream and downstream resources required to perform them, such as surgical kits, post anesthesia care unit (PACU) beds, and surgical teams (surgeons, nurses and anesthetists).

methodsUsing hybrid flow shop (HFS) techniques and the break-in-moment (BIM) concept, the goal is to find a sequence that maximizes the number of procedures assigned to the ORs while minimizing the variance of intervals between surgeries' completions, smoothing the demand for downstream resources such as PACU beds and OR sanitizing teams. There are five steps to the proposed heuristic: listing of priorities, local scheduling, global scheduling, feasibility check and identification of best scheduling.

resultsOur propositions were validated in a high complexity tertiary University hospital in two ways: first, applying the heuristic to historical data from five typical ST days and comparing the performance of our proposed sequences to the ones actually implemented; second, pilot testing the heuristic during ten days in the ORs, allowing a full rotation of surgical specialties. Results displayed an average increase of 37.2% in OR occupancy, allowing an average increase of 4.5 in the number of surgeries performed daily, and reducing the variance of intervals between surgeries' completions by 55.5%. A more uniform distribution of patients' arrivals at the PACU was also observed.

conclusionsOur proposed heuristic is particularly useful to plan the operation of STs in which resources are constrained, a situation that is common in hospital from developing countries. Our propositions were validated through a pilot implementation in a large hospital, contributing to the scarce literature on actual OR scheduling implementation.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesSurgical Procedures, OperativeHealth ResourcesHeuristicsHumansModels, TheoreticalOperating RoomsBreak-in-momentOperating roomOR sequencingSurgery schedulingSurgical theater management

Identifiers

PMID32703210
PMCPMC7379827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.