Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32703208›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Normalizing inconvenience to promote childhood vaccination: a qualitative implementation evaluation of a novel Michigan program.

Denise F Lillvis, Charley Willison, Katia Noyes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Denise F LillvisDepartment of Family Medicine, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, 77 Goodell St., Ste 220, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA. dlillvis@buffalo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1507-542X
Charley WillisonDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180A Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Katia NoyesDivision of Health Services Policy and Practice, School of Public Health and Health Professions, 270C Farber Hall, Buffalo, NY, 14214, USA.
Harvard University · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Health Policy Training Program: Promoting Outcomes, Quality, Equity and Diffusion of AdvancesT32MH019733 · NIMH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI Benjamin Le Cook, Haiden A Huskamp · 1993 to 2026
$7.0M
Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies, University of Michigan n/aHRSA HHS T32 HP30035NIMH NIH HHS 5T32MH019733-25NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019733
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2015, Michigan implemented a rule requiring parents to attend an education session at a local health department (LHD) prior to waiving mandatory child vaccinations. This study utilizes Normalization Process Theory (NPT) to assess program implementation, identifying potential threats to fidelity and sustainability.

methodsWe conducted 32 semi-structured interviews with individuals involved in these education programs across 16 LHDs. Participating LHDs were selected from a stratified, representative sample. One interviewer conducted all interviews using a semi-structured interview guide; two authors coded and analyzed the interview transcripts according to the NPT framework (i.e, sense-making, engagement, collective action, and reflexive monitoring).

resultsThere was a lack of consensus about who the stakeholders of this new rule and its resulting program were (sense-making). Perhaps as a result, most LHDs did not solicit advice from key stakeholder groups (i.e., schools, health care providers, community stakeholders) in their planning (engagement). While most interviewees identified providing education and information as the goal, some identified the more challenging goal of persuading vaccine hesitant parents to immunize their children. There was also some variation in perception of who held health educators accountable for meeting the goals of the waiver education program (collective action). Formal program evaluation by LHDs was rare, although some held informal staff debriefings. Additionally, sessions that went particularly well or poorly were top-of-mind (reflexive monitoring).

conclusionsThe immunization waiver education program may be at risk of not becoming fully embedded into routine LHD practice, potentially compromising its long-term effectiveness and sustainability. Managers at the local and state level should maintain oversight to ensure that the program is delivered with fidelity. As the program relies on sustaining inconvenience to encourage parents to immunize their children, any shortcuts taken will undermine its success.

Indexed as

Health EducationChildHumansImmunization ProgramsMandatory ProgramsMichiganParentsProgram EvaluationPsychological TheoryQualitative ResearchCommunity health educationCounty governmentGovernment agencyImmunization programsImplementationNormalization process theoryOrganization and administration

Identifiers

PMID32703208
PMCPMC7379806
OpenAlexW3044439543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.