Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32703169›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Association of provider advice and gestational weight gain in twin pregnancies: a cross-sectional electronic survey.

Kara M Whitaker, Meghan Baruth, Rebecca A Schlaff, Christopher P Connolly, Jihong Liu, Sara Wilcox

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kara M WhitakerDepartment of Health and Human Physiology and Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, E116 Field House, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA. kara-whitaker@uiowa.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2343-4162
Meghan BaruthDepartment of Health Sciences, Saginaw Valley State University, University Center, MI, USA.
Rebecca A SchlaffDepartment of Health Sciences, Saginaw Valley State University, University Center, MI, USA.
Christopher P ConnollyDepartment of Educational Leadership, Sports Studies, and Educational/Counseling Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA.
Jihong LiuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Sara WilcoxDepartment of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Saginaw Valley State University · USUniversity of South Carolina · USUniversity of Iowa · USWashington State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about patient-provider communication on gestational weight gain among women pregnant with twins, a growing population at high risk for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. We examined if women's report of provider advice on gestational weight gain was consistent with the Institute of Medicine (IOM) weight gain guidelines for twin pregnancies, and the association of provider advice on weight gain with women's weight gain during their twin pregnancy.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of 276 women who delivered twins and received prenatal care in the United States. The 2009 IOM provisional weight gain guidelines for twin pregnancies defined whether provider advice on weight gain and women's weight gain were below, within, or above guidelines. Multinomial logistic regression examined associations between provider advice on weight gain with women's weight gain, after adjustment for maternal age, gestational age at delivery, education, parity, twin type, use of assisted reproductive technologies and pre-pregnancy BMI category.

resultsApproximately 30% of women described provider advice on weight gain below the IOM guidelines, 60% within, and 10% above guidelines. Compared to women who reported weight gain advice within guidelines, women who reported advice below guidelines or who reported no advice were 7.1 (95% CI: 3.2, 16.0) and 2.7 (95% CI: 1.3, 5.6) times more likely to gain less than recommended, respectively. Women who reported provider advice above guidelines were 4.6 (95% CI: 1.5, 14.2) times more likely to exceed guidelines.

conclusionsProvider advice on gestational weight gain may be an important predictor of women's weight gain during twin pregnancies, highlighting the critical need for accurate provider counseling to optimize health outcomes.

Indexed as

CounselingGestational Weight GainPhysician-Patient RelationsPrenatal CareBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy, TwinSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung AdultGestational weight gainHealth care providerPatient-provider communicationPregnancyTwins

Identifiers

PMID32703169
PMCPMC7376962
OpenAlexW3044632544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.