Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32703081›Full record

SynthesisUnited European gastroenterology journal2020

Prophylactic total pancreatectomy in individuals at high risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PROPAN): systematic review and shared decision-making programme using decision tables.

Lianne Scholten, Anouk Ej Latenstein, Cora M Aalfs, Marco J Bruno, Olivier R Busch, Bert A Bonsing, Bas Groot Koerkamp, I Quintus Molenaar, Dirk T Ubbink, Jeanin E van Hooft and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in United European gastroenterology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Hereditary pancreatic cancer.International journal of clinical oncology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lianne ScholtenDepartment of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anouk Ej LatensteinDepartment of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3492-4968
Cora M AalfsDepartment of Clinical Genetics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marco J BrunoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Olivier R BuschDepartment of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bert A BonsingDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Bas Groot KoerkampDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
I Quintus MolenaarDepartment of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein and University Medical Center Utrecht Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Dirk T UbbinkDepartment of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeanin E van HooftDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Paul FockensDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jolanda GlasDutch Pancreatic Cancer Patient Organisation, 'Living with Hope', Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Hans DeVriesDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marc G BesselinkDepartment of Surgery, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group
University of Amsterdam · NLErasmus MC · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals with a very high lifetime risk of developing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; for example, hereditary pancreatitis and main-duct or mixed-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, may wish to discuss prophylactic total pancreatectomy but strategies to do so are lacking.

objectiveTo develop a shared decision-making programme for prophylactic total pancreatectomy using decision tables.

methodsFocus group meetings with patients were used to identify relevant questions. Systematic reviews were performed to answer these questions.

resultsThe first tables included hereditary pancreatitis and main-duct or mixed-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm. No studies focused on prophylactic total pancreatectomy in these groups. In 52 studies (3570 patients), major morbidity after total pancreatectomy was 25% and 30-day mortality was 6%. After minimally invasive total pancreatectomy (seven studies, 35 patients) this was, respectively, 13% and 0%. Exocrine insufficiency-related symptoms occurred in 33%. Quality of life after total pancreatectomy was slightly lower compared with the general population.

conclusionThe decision tables can be helpful for discussing prophylactic total pancreatectomy with individuals at high risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedDecision Support TechniquesCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalDisease ProgressionExocrine Pancreatic InsufficiencyHumansPancreatectomyPancreatic DuctsPancreatic NeoplasmsPancreatitis, ChronicPostoperative ComplicationsProphylactic Surgical ProceduresQuality of LifeRisk AssessmentTreatment Outcomecancer riskdiabetes mellitushereditary pancreatitisintraductal papillary mucinous neoplasmmutationPancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaprophylactic total pancreatectomy

Identifiers

PMID32703081
PMCPMC7707864
OpenAlexW3044676309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.