ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2021
Seroprevalence of poliovirus antibodies before and after polio vaccine switch in 2012 and 2017 in Beijing.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Population immunity to the three serotypes of poliovirus post-interruption of wild poliovirus transmission in Nigeria.Journal of virus eradication · 2025Article
- Poliovirus serological assay after the cVDPV1 outbreak in Papua New Guinea: a cross-sectional study from 2020 to 2021.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Article
- Immune persistence of an inactivated poliovirus vaccine derived from the Sabin strain: a 10-year follow-up of a phase 3 study.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2000, China was declared polio-free. However, in 2018, wild poliovirus (WPV) was still endemic in two of its neighboring countries, making WPV importation and outbreak alarming possibilities. This study documents the seroprevalence of poliovirus antibodies before and after the polio vaccine switch in 2012 and 2017 in Beijing. Cross-sectional population-based serologic surveys were conducted in 2012 and 2017 in Beijing. The study subjects were selected from 10 different age groups (<1, 1-4, 5-9, 10-14, 15-19, 20-24, 25-29, 30-34, 35-39, and ≥40 y) using a multi-stage-stratified sampling method. Neutralizing antibody titers against poliovirus serotypes 1 (P1), 2 (P2), and 3 (P3) were assayed by World Health Organization standards. The seropositive rates (SR) and geometric mean titer (GMT) of the neutralizing antibodies were 91.71% and 1:130.26, respectively, for P1, 94.09% and 1:113.39, respectively, for P2, and 88.78% and 1:79.65, respectively, for P3 before the switch in 2012, and 87.78% and 1:108.93, respectively, for P1, and 81.67% and 1:70.56, respectively, for P3 after the switch in 2017, with a statistically significant difference for P1 and P3 between 2012 and 2017. The neutralizing antibodies for all poliovirus serotypes differed among different age and vaccination groups in both 2012 and 2017. After switching polio vaccines twice in 2014 and 2016, the P1 and P3 polio antibody levels were lower in 2017 than in 2012. The P2 antibody levels were determined from the first dose of IPV. The seroprevalence of poliovirus antibodies after adjustment of the immunization schedule of the polio vaccine on January 1, 2020, must be further monitored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.