Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32702925›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2020

To use indwelling drainage or not in dual-plane breast augmentation mammoplasty patients: A comparative study.

Yiding Xiao, Jianqiang Hu, Mingzi Zhang, Wenchao Zhang, Feng Qin, Ang Zeng, Xiaojun Wang, Zhifei Liu, Lin Zhu, Nanze Yu and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yiding XiaoDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing.
Jianqiang HuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Qingdao Huangdao District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Qingdao, Shandong.
Mingzi ZhangDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing.
Wenchao ZhangDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing.
Feng QinDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing.
Ang ZengDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing.ORCID 0000-0002-9582-8198
Xiaojun WangDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing.
Zhifei LiuDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing.
Lin ZhuDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing.
Nanze YuDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing.
Loubin SiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing.
Fei LongDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing.
Yu DingDepartment of Information Engineering, Chaoshan Polytechnic College, Puning, Guangdong, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNShunde Polytechnic · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To explore the necessity of indwelling drainage in dual-plane breast augmentation mammoplasty patients.Female patients (123 in total) were selected from June 2015 to June 2018 in the Department of Plastic Surgery at Peking Union Medical College Hospital and were randomly divided into 2 different groups: the with drainage group (WD group, 57 patients) and the without drainage group (WOD group, 66 patients). In the 2 groups, the operation time, postoperative stay, and hospitalization expenses were recorded. The BREAST-Q Version 2.0 Augmentation Module Pre- and Postoperative Scales (Chinese Version) were used to evaluate psychosocial well-being, sexual well-being, physical well-being, and satisfaction with breasts preoperatively and postoperatively (1 year after operation).Before the operation, no significant differences were found in psychosocial well-being, sexual well-being, physical well-being, or satisfaction with breasts between these 2 groups. In the WOD group, postoperative stay and hospitalization expenses were remarkably decreased, but the operation time was similar, compared with the WD group. Compared with before the operation, both groups had significantly increased scores in psychosocial well-being, sexual well-being, and satisfaction with breasts after the operation. However, no significant differences were found between the 2 groups. No complications were found in any of the patients.Although the operation time was not significantly decreased, patients without drainage could save much more time and money and simultaneously reach similar postoperative effects in psychosocial well-being, sexual well-being, physical well-being, and satisfaction with breasts. Therefore, drainage may not be necessary in patients who undergo dual-plane breast augmentation mammoplasty.

Indexed as

Catheters, IndwellingAdolescentAdultBreast ImplantationBreast ImplantsDrainageFemaleHumansMammaplastyMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionPsychologyYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32702925
PMCPMC7373562
OpenAlexW3042418271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.