ArticleMedicine2020
A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis of narrow band imaging endoscopy in detection of early gastric cancer.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Ultrasound after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer Restaging: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Gelsolin Can Be a Prognostic Biomarker and Correlated with Immune Infiltrates in Gastric Cancer.International journal of general medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough previous studies have utilized narrow band imaging endoscopy diagnosis (NBIED) in detection of patients with early gastric cancer (EGC), there are still inconsistent results. Thus, this study will explore the accuracy of NBIED in detection of patients with EGC.
methodsWe propose to perform literature search of potential studies investigating the accuracy of NBIED in detection of patients with EGC in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, WANGFANG, VIP database and China National Knowledge Infrastructure from the beginning of each database to January 31, 2020 without restrictions to language and publication time. Two authors will independently scrutinize these databases to identify studies that satisfy all predefined eligibility criteria. We will check study quality and analyze outcome data using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool, and RevMan 5.3 software respectively.
resultsWe anticipate the results of this study will afford additional insight into the appraising of the accuracy of NBIED in patients with EGC.
conclusionThe findings of this study will be useful informing diagnostic decisions for the diagnosis of patients with EGC.PROSPERO registration number: PROSPERO CRD42020171053.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.