Observational studyMedicine2020
Emergency transfers of home care patients in Fukui Prefecture, Japan: A retrospective observational study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Little is known about how emergency transfers take place and what outcomes they lead to in the patients who receive home care in Japan. We aimed to assess outcomes of emergency transfers and factors associated with such outcomes in the Japanese home care setting.A retrospective analysis of patient data from a home care clinic in Fukui, Japan, included all patients who experienced emergency transfers which were reported to the clinic during 2018 and 2019. We collected data on patients' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, as well as the transfer process and its outcome, using patient charts and other administrative records. We first analyzed the overall outcome and then evaluated whether transfer outcomes would differ according to by whom and from where the emergency medical service (EMS) was called, by univariate and multivariate analyses.We considered 63 patients who experienced emergency transfers during the study period. Of the total, 10 (15.9%) returned to their residences without being admitted or being dead on arrival. Although only 2.6% (1/39) of patients whose transfers were determined by health care professionals (HCPs) returned home without being admitted, a direct return was observed for 37.5% (9/24) of patients whose transfer was determined by those other than HCPs (odds ratio of direct return to residences 22.80, 95% confidence interval 2.65-195.87). There was no other variable which was significantly associated with the outcomes after the emergency transfers, although all the patients who have no available caregivers resulted in hospitalization.In this preliminary analysis in the Japanese home care setting, only a small proportion of patients returned to their residences without being admitted following emergency transfers. Patients whose EMS transfer was requested by an HCP usually resulted in an admission to the clinic, whereas transfers requested by non-HCPs frequently did not.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.