Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32702882›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

The sensitivity and specificity of statistical rules for diagnosing delayed neurocognitive recovery with Montreal cognitive assessment in elderly surgical patients: A cohort study.

Jian Hu, Chun-Jing Li, Bo-Jie Wang, Xue-Ying Li, Dong-Liang Mu, Dong-Xin Wang

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05335902 (The Influence of Extracorporeal Circulation During Cardiac Surgery on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05335902 completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Influence of Extracorporeal Circulation During Cardiac Surgery on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Medical Centre MariborRan2021 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsCardiac Disease, Cardiac Valve DiseaseArmsultrasound measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter, MoCA test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Preoperative biomarkers associated with delayed neurocognitive recovery.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2025
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jian HuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Peking University First Hospital.
Chun-Jing LiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Peking University First Hospital.
Bo-Jie WangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Peking University First Hospital.
Xue-Ying LiDepartment of Biostatics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Dong-Liang MuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Peking University First Hospital.ORCID 0000-0003-1092-9473
Dong-Xin WangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Peking University First Hospital.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delayed neurocognitive recovery (DNR) is common in elderly patients after major noncardiac surgery. This study was designed to investigate the best statistical rule in diagnosing DNR with the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) in elderly surgical patients.This was a cohort study. One hundred seventy-five elderly (60 years or over) patients who were scheduled to undergo major noncardiac surgery were enrolled. A battery of neuropsychological tests and the MoCA were employed to test cognitive function at the day before and on fifth day after surgery. Fifty-three age- and education-matched nonsurgical control subjects completed cognitive assessment with the same instruments at the same time interval. The definition of the international study of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (ISPOCD 1) was adopted as the standard reference for diagnosing DNR. With the MoCA, the following rules were used to diagnose DNR: the cut-off point of ≤26; the 1 standard deviation decline from baseline; the 2 scores decline from baseline; and the Z score of ≥1.96. The sensitivity and specificity as well as the area under receiver operating characteristic curve for the above rules in diagnosis of DNR were calculated.The incidence of DNR was 13.1% (23/175) according to the ISPOCD1 definition. When compared with the standard reference, the 2 scores rule showed the best combination of sensitivity (82.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 67.1%-98.1%) and specificity (82.2%, 95% CI 76.2%-88.3%); it also had the largest area under receiver operating characteristic curve (0.824, 95% CI 0.728-0.921, P < .001). The cut-off point rule showed high sensitivity (95.7%) and low specificity (37.5%), whereas the 1 standard deviation and the Z score rules showed low sensitivity (47.8% and 21.7%, respectively) and high specificity (93.4% and 97.3%, respectively).Compared with the ISPOCD1 definition, the 2 scores rule with MoCA had the best combination of sensitivity and specificity to diagnose DNR.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMental Status and Dementia TestsMiddle AgedNeurocognitive DisordersNeuropsychological TestsReproducibility of ResultsROC CurveSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID32702882
PMCPMC7373532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.