Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32702874›Full record

ArticleMedicine2020

The effectiveness of different exercise modalities on sleep quality: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Peiye Cao, Ying Cai, Shifang Zhang, Qiaoqin Wan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peiye CaoPeking University People's Hospital.
Ying CaiSchool of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Shifang ZhangSchool of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Qiaoqin WanSchool of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9310-7277

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, the effect of exercise on sleep quality has been paid increasing attention by researchers. A number of systematic reviews and direct meta-analyses have explored the effectiveness of exercise on sleep quality. However, which type of exercise is optimal for sleep quality is still not clear. Therefore, this study aims to adopt network meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of different exercise modalities on sleep quality and find the most effective one for improving sleep quality.

methodsThe databases searched included PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, and SPORTDiscus. Studies published in English and from the dates of database inception to October 8, 2019, were included. Besides, we also checked the reference lists of systematic reviews published in recent years. Two independent researchers screened all studies, included the studies that met eligible criteria and will then extract data. The risk of bias will be assessed by the 2 researchers according to the modified Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. During these processes, any disagreement will be discussed to reach a consensus. STATA 14.0 software will be used for direct meta-analysis and network meta-analysis.

resultsHigh-quality synthesis of current evidences will be provided from Pittsburgh sleep quality index. And the effectiveness of different exercise modalities for sleep quality will also be shown.

conclusionThis study will provide the evidence of the most effective exercise for better sleep quality. REGISTRATION: This study was registered with the International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (registration number: INPLASY202050096).

Indexed as

ExerciseHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicSleep Wake DisordersSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID32702874
PMCPMC7373514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.