Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32702288›Full record

ArticleNeuron2020

Map Making: Constructing, Combining, and Inferring on Abstract Cognitive Maps.

Seongmin A Park, Douglas S Miller, Hamed Nili, Charan Ranganath, Erie D Boorman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cognitive maps as a medium for thought.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Hierarchical Reconfiguration of Neurocognitive Task Set Representations Mediates Cognitive Flexibility.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Entorhinal Cortex Signals Dimensions of Past Experience That Can Be Generalized in a Novel Environment.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Seongmin A ParkCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA. Electronic address: seongmin.a.park@gmail.com.
Douglas S MillerCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Hamed NiliWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Charan RanganathCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA; Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Erie D BoormanCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA; Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA. Electronic address: edboorman@ucdavis.edu.

Funding

Model-based credit assignmentR56MH119116 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BOORMAN, ERIE D · 2020 to 2021
$770k
NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH119116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive maps enable efficient inferences from limited experience that can guide novel decisions. We tested whether the hippocampus (HC), entorhinal cortex (EC), and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC)/medial orbitofrontal cortex (mOFC) organize abstract and discrete relational information into a cognitive map to guide novel inferences. Subjects learned the status of people in two unseen 2D social hierarchies, with each dimension learned on a separate day. Although one dimension was behaviorally relevant, multivariate activity patterns in HC, EC, and vmPFC/mOFC were linearly related to the Euclidean distance between people in the mentally reconstructed 2D space. Hubs created unique comparisons between the hierarchies, enabling inferences between novel pairs. We found that both behavior and neural activity in EC and vmPFC/mOFC reflected the Euclidean distance to the retrieved hub, which was reinstated in HC. These findings reveal how abstract and discrete relational structures are represented, are combined, and enable novel inferences in the human brain.

Indexed as

CognitionSocial BehaviorCerebral CortexConnectomeFemaleHippocampusHumansLearningMaleModels, NeurologicalYoung Adult2D spaceCognitive mapEntorhinal cortexEuclideanGeneralizationHippocampusInferenceModel basedOrbitofrontal cortexSocial network

Identifiers

PMID32702288
PMCPMC7529977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.