Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32702189›Full record

ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2021

Variants of uncertain significance in prenatal microarrays: a retrospective cohort study.

A H Mardy, A P Wiita, B V Wayman, K Drexler, T N Sparks, M E Norton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Chromosomal Microarray: Still Relevant in NGS Era.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A H MardyDivision of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3675-4528
A P WiitaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
B V WaymanCytogenetics Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
K DrexlerPrenatal Diagnostic Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
T N SparksDivision of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8593-2186
M E NortonDivision of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

WOMEN'S REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH RESEARCH CENTERK12HD001262 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Andrea Vashti Jackson · 1998 to 2026
$9.3M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD001262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo categorise the variants of uncertain significance found with prenatal chromosomal microarray and determine the proportion of such variants that are associated with a well-known phenotype in order to establish how often they remain truly of uncertain significance.

designRetrospective cohort study.

settingThe University of California, San Francisco. POPULATION: All patients with a variant of uncertain significance on prenatal microarray between 2014 and 2018.

methodsEach variant was classified as a copy number variant that (a) contains Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM)-annotated disease-causing genes ('OMIM morbid genes'); (b) confers autosomal recessive carrier status; (c) is associated with incomplete penetrance; (d) is >1 Mb in size without OMIM morbid genes; (e) demonstrates mosaicism; or (f) contains significant regions of homozygosity. For each variant of uncertain significance, we examined the existing literature to determine whether the predicted phenotype(s) was known.

main outcome measurePrevalence and classification of variants and how much information is available regarding the likelihood of an affected phenotype.

resultsOf 970 prenatal microarrays, 55 (5.8%) had at least one variant of uncertain significance. The most common were copy number variants containing OMIM morbid genes (36.8%). In all, 48 (84.2%) were associated with a known phenotype; 55 (96.5%) had data available regarding the likelihood of an affected phenotype.

conclusionsThe prevalence of variants of uncertain significance with prenatal microarray was 5.8%. In the large majority of cases, data were available regarding the predicted phenotype. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Variants of uncertain significance occur in 5.8% of prenatal microarrays. In the overwhelming majority of cases, outcome information is available.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsDNA Copy Number VariationsAdolescentAdultFemaleFetal DiseasesHumansMicroarray AnalysisMiddle AgedPhenotypePregnancyPregnancy OutcomePrenatal DiagnosisRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultMicroarrayprenatalvariants of uncertain significance

Identifiers

PMID32702189
PMCPMC7856034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.