Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32702116›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2021

Gaps in Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening Among Men who Have Sex with Men in Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Care in the United States.

Christina Chandra, Kevin M Weiss, Colleen F Kelley, Julia L Marcus, Samuel M Jenness

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Very High Incidence ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. HIV, STI and renal function testing frequency and STI history among current users of self-funded HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis, a cross-sectional study, Germany, 2018 and 2019.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christina ChandraDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Kevin M WeissDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Colleen F KelleyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5611-0119
Julia L MarcusHarvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Samuel M JennessDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8840-105X
Emory University · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Modeling Antiretroviral-Based Prevention among MSM in the USR21MH112449 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JENNESS, SAMUEL · 2017 to 2018
$442k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH112449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends comprehensive sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening every 3-6 months for men who have sex with men (MSM) using human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). The gaps between these recommendations and clinical practice by region have not been quantified.

methodsWe used survey data collected from the internet-based ARTnet study between 2017 and 2019 on STI screening among MSM across the United States, stratified by current, prior, and never PrEP use. Poisson regression models with robust error variance were used to model factors, including residence in the Southeast, associated with consistent ("always" or "sometimes") exposure site-specific STI screening during PrEP care.

resultsOf 3259 HIV-negative MSM, 19% were currently using PrEP, 6% had used PrEP in the past, and 75% had never used PrEP. Among ever PrEP users, 87%, 78%, 57%, and 64% reported consistent screening for STIs by blood sample, urine sample or urethral swab, rectal swab, or pharyngeal swab, respectively, during PrEP care. Compared to PrEP users in all other regions, PrEP users in the Southeast were significantly less likely to be consistently screened for urogenital (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR], 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], .76-.98) and rectal STIs (aPR, 0.76; 95% CI, .62-.93) during PrEP care.

conclusionsSubstantial gaps exist between CDC recommendations for STI screening during PrEP care and current clinical practice, particularly for rectal and pharyngeal exposure sites that can harbor asymptomatic infections and for MSM in Southeast states where the STI burden is substantial.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexual and Gender MinoritiesSexually Transmitted DiseasesHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleUnited StatesHIVmen who have sex with menpre-exposure prophylaxisscreeningsexually transmitted infections

Identifiers

PMID32702116
PMCPMC8492145
OpenAlexW3043959505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.