ArticlePloS one2020
A data driven clinical algorithm for differential diagnosis of pertussis and other respiratory infections in infants.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Symptom-based diagnostic models for common respiratory viral infections: a machine learning and natural language processing study.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2026Article
- Leveraging large language models on free-text symptoms from participatory surveillance enhances pertussis forecasting in the United States.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Pertussis risk assessment in children: a retrospective study of blood parameters from two medical centers.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Observational
- Machine learning-based risk prediction model for pertussis in children: a multicenter retrospective study.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Effect of Early Administration of Clarithromycin or Azithromycin on Symptoms of Pertussis in Infants.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a diagnostic prediction model for children with pertussis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Mucosal vaccination with outer membrane vesicles derived fromFrontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Machine learning clinical decision support systems for surveillance: a case study on pertussis and RSV in children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Hospital-based prospective study of pertussis in infants and close contacts in Tehran, Iran.BMC infectious diseases · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClinical criteria for pertussis diagnosis and clinical case definitions for surveillance are based on a cough lasting two or more weeks. As several pertussis cases seek care earlier, a clinical tool independent of cough duration may support earlier recognition. We developed a data-driven algorithm aimed at predicting a laboratory confirmed pertussis.
methodsWe enrolled children <12 months of age presenting with apnoea, paroxistic cough, whooping, or post-tussive vomiting, irrespective of the duration of cough. Patients underwent a RT-PCR test for pertussis and other viruses. Through a logistic regression model, we identified symptoms associated with laboratory confirmed pertussis. We then developed a predictive decision tree through Quinlan's C4.5 algorithm to predict laboratory confirmed pertussis.
resultsWe enrolled 543 children, of which 160 had a positive RT-PCR for pertussis. A suspicion of pertussis by a physician (aOR 5.44) or a blood count showing leukocytosis and lymphocytosis (aOR 4.48) were highly predictive of lab confirmed pertussis. An algorithm including a suspicion of pertussis by a physician, whooping, cyanosis and absence of fever was accurate (79.9%) and specific (94.0%) and had high positive and negative predictive values (PPV 76.3% NPV 80.7%).
conclusionsAn algorithm based on clinical symptoms, not including the duration of cough, is accurate and has high predictive values for lab confirmed pertussis. Such a tool may be useful in low resource settings where lab confirmation is unavailable, to guide differential diagnosis and clinical decisions. Algorithms may also be useful to improve surveillance for pertussis and anticipating classification of cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.