Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32702054›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

A data driven clinical algorithm for differential diagnosis of pertussis and other respiratory infections in infants.

Alberto Eugenio Tozzi, Francesco Gesualdo, Caterina Rizzo, Emanuela Carloni, Luisa Russo, Ilaria Campagna, Alberto Villani, Antonino Reale, Carlo Concato, Giulia Linardos and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alberto Eugenio TozziPredictive and Preventive Medicine Research Unit, Multifactorial and Systemic Diseases Research Area, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Francesco GesualdoPredictive and Preventive Medicine Research Unit, Multifactorial and Systemic Diseases Research Area, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9087-4398
Caterina RizzoPredictive and Preventive Medicine Research Unit, Multifactorial and Systemic Diseases Research Area, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Emanuela CarloniPredictive and Preventive Medicine Research Unit, Multifactorial and Systemic Diseases Research Area, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Luisa RussoPredictive and Preventive Medicine Research Unit, Multifactorial and Systemic Diseases Research Area, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Ilaria CampagnaPredictive and Preventive Medicine Research Unit, Multifactorial and Systemic Diseases Research Area, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Alberto VillaniGeneral Pediatrics and Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Antonino RealePediatric Emergency Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Carlo ConcatoVirology Unit, Laboratory Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Giulia LinardosVirology Unit, Laboratory Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Elisabetta PandolfiPredictive and Preventive Medicine Research Unit, Multifactorial and Systemic Diseases Research Area, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical criteria for pertussis diagnosis and clinical case definitions for surveillance are based on a cough lasting two or more weeks. As several pertussis cases seek care earlier, a clinical tool independent of cough duration may support earlier recognition. We developed a data-driven algorithm aimed at predicting a laboratory confirmed pertussis.

methodsWe enrolled children <12 months of age presenting with apnoea, paroxistic cough, whooping, or post-tussive vomiting, irrespective of the duration of cough. Patients underwent a RT-PCR test for pertussis and other viruses. Through a logistic regression model, we identified symptoms associated with laboratory confirmed pertussis. We then developed a predictive decision tree through Quinlan's C4.5 algorithm to predict laboratory confirmed pertussis.

resultsWe enrolled 543 children, of which 160 had a positive RT-PCR for pertussis. A suspicion of pertussis by a physician (aOR 5.44) or a blood count showing leukocytosis and lymphocytosis (aOR 4.48) were highly predictive of lab confirmed pertussis. An algorithm including a suspicion of pertussis by a physician, whooping, cyanosis and absence of fever was accurate (79.9%) and specific (94.0%) and had high positive and negative predictive values (PPV 76.3% NPV 80.7%).

conclusionsAn algorithm based on clinical symptoms, not including the duration of cough, is accurate and has high predictive values for lab confirmed pertussis. Such a tool may be useful in low resource settings where lab confirmation is unavailable, to guide differential diagnosis and clinical decisions. Algorithms may also be useful to improve surveillance for pertussis and anticipating classification of cases.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMedical InformaticsWhooping Cough

Identifiers

PMID32702054
PMCPMC7377414
OpenAlexW3043927732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.