Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32702036›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Rate of opioid use disorder in adults who received prescription opioid pain therapy-A secondary data analysis.

Johannes M Just, Norbert Scherbaum, Michael Specka, Marie-Therese Puth, Klaus Weckbecker

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Johannes M JustInstitute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, Faculty of Health / Department of Medicine, University Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0866-5480
Norbert ScherbaumLVR-Hospital Essen, Department of Addictive Behaviour and Addiction Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Michael SpeckaLVR-Hospital Essen, Department of Addictive Behaviour and Addiction Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5194-7876
Marie-Therese PuthDepartment of Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology (IMBIE), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Klaus WeckbeckerInstitute of General Practice and Interprofessional Care, Faculty of Health / Department of Medicine, University Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
University of Duisburg-Essen · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsData on rates of prescription opioid use disorder (pOUD) in European countries is limited. The aim of this investigation was to analyze a representative population sample regarding the 1-year prevalence of opioid use disorder in patients who received prescription opioid pain therapy and to identify related risk factors.

designCross-sectional secondary data analysis.

settingSecondary data analysis based on data from the 2015 Epidemiological Survey of Substance Abuse (ESA 2015) in Germany.

participantsGerman-speaking individuals living in private households aged 18 to 64 years were investigated. A total of 9204 individuals participated in the survey, resulting in a response rate of 52.2%. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was the weighted prevalence of pOUD in the subgroup of study participants who had received prescription opioids. Secondary outcome measure was an analysis of risk factors connected with pOUD in the same subgroup.

findingsA total of n = 9204 participants were included in the study of which n = 275 had received an opioid prescription in the last 12 months of which n = 54 were diagnosed with pOUD. The weighted 1-year prevalence of pOUD was 21.2% (mild: 14.7% | moderate: 3.5% | severe: 2.9%). Participants who had received opioid pain therapy had significantly higher odds of pOUD if they reported signs of depression (OR: 2.69; CI 95%: 1.13-6.38), inexplicable physical complaints (OR: 2.68; CI 95%: 1.14-6.31) or a psychiatric diagnosis (OR: 4.12; CI 95%: 1.36-12.43), and significantly lower odds of pOUD if they reported the use of non-opioid painkillers (OR: 0.27; CI 95%: 0.09-0.81).

conclusionspOUD is a common phenomenon in working-age patients who receive prescription opioid pain therapy in Germany and may be related to the co-existence of psychosomatic and psychiatric disorders such as depression.

Indexed as

Drug PrescriptionsPain ManagementAdultAnalgesics, OpioidData AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleOpioid-Related DisordersRegression AnalysisAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID32702036
PMCPMC7377413
OpenAlexW3045006674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.