ArticlePloS one2020
Pragmatic accuracy of an in-house loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in a Thai community hospital.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Low-complexity manual nucleic acid amplification tests for pulmonary tuberculosis in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- New Tool Against Tuberculosis: The Potential of the LAMP Lateral Flow Assay in Resource-Limited Settings.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- RTP4, a Biomarker Associated with Diagnosing Pulmonary Tuberculosis and Pan-Cancer Analysis.Mediators of inflammation · 2023Article
- Evaluation of an in-house loop-mediated isothermal amplification for Mycobacterium tuberculosis detection in a remote reference laboratory, Thailand.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Host Protein Biomarkers by ELISA From Whole Lysed Peripheral Blood for Development of Diagnostic Tests for Active Tuberculosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Tracking SARS-CoV-2: Novel Trends and Diagnostic Strategies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Tuberculosis diagnostics: overcoming ancient challenges with modern solutions.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo improve the quality of diagnosing pulmonary tuberculosis (TB), WHO recommends the use of rapid molecular testing as an alternative to conventional microscopic methods. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay (LAMP test) is a practical and cost-effective nucleic amplification technique. We evaluated the pragmatic accuracy of an in-house LAMP assay for the diagnosis of TB in a remote health care setting where an advanced rapid molecular test is not available.
methodsA prospective diagnostic accuracy study was conducted. Patients with clinical symptoms suggestive of TB were consecutively enrolled from April to August 2016. Sputum samples were collected from each patient and were sent for microscopic examination (both acid-fast stain and fluorescence stain), in-house LAMP test, and TB culture.
resultsOne hundred and seven patients with TB symptoms were used in the final analysis. This included 50 (46.7%) culture-positive TB patients and 57 (53.3%) culture-negative patients. The overall sensitivity of the in-house LAMP based on culture positivity was 88.8% (95/107) with a 95%CI of 81.2-94.1. The sensitivity was 90.9% (40/44) with a 95%CI of 78.3-97.5 for smear-positive, culture-positive patients, and was 16.7% (1/6) with a 95%CI of 0.4-64.1 for smear-negative, culture-positive patients. The overall sensitivity of the in-house LAMP test compared to smear microscopy methods were not significantly different (p = 0.375). The specificity of the in-house LAMP based on non-TB patients (smear-negative, culture-negative) was 94.7% (54/57) with a 95%CI of 85.4-98.9.
conclusionsThe diagnostic accuracy of the in-house LAMP test in a community hospital was comparable to other previous reports in terms of specificity. The sensitivity of the in-house assay could be improved with better sputum processing and DNA extraction method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.