ArticlePLoS medicine2020
Probability of sepsis after infection consultations in primary care in the United Kingdom in 2002-2017: Population-based cohort study and decision analytic model.
Article in PLoS medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of PA-100 AST System Rapid Antibiotic Susceptibility Test on Antibiotic Prescription for Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infections in Spanish Primary Care Settings.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Association between hospital frailty risk score, risk of sepsis and adverse outcomes across all adult ages.PloS one · 2026Article
- Risk factors and an optimized prediction model for urosepsis in diabetic patients with upper urinary tract stones.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Optimising antibiotic exposure by customising the duration of treatment for respiratory tract infections based on patient needs in primary care.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Review
- Antibiotic utilization and symptom improvement in a retrospective cohort of women with urinary tract infection symptoms.International urogynecology journal · 2024Article
- Assessing the impact of discordant antibiotic treatment on adverse outcomes in community-onset UTI: a retrospective cohort study.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2024Article
- NSAID prescribing and adverse outcomes in common infections: a population-based cohort study.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Sleep duration time and human papillomavirus infection risk: The U-shaped relationship revealed by NHANES data.PloS one · 2024Article
- Hospital admission after primary care consultation for community-onset lower urinary tract infection: a cohort study of risks and predictors using linked data.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023Article
- Clinical frailty, and not features of acute infection, is associated with late mortality in COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2022Article
- Incidence of urosepsis or pyelonephritis after uncomplicated urinary tract infection in older women.International urogynecology journal · 2022Article
- Frailty increases the risk for developing urinary tract infection among 79,887 patients with diabetic mellitus and chronic kidney disease.BMC geriatrics · 2021Article
- Antimicrobial stewardship in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based cohort study and interrupted time-series analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021Article
- Frailty associated urinary tract infections (FaUTIs).Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls · 2021Review
- Article
- Frailty Status Predicts Urinary Tract Infection Risk Following Kidney Transplant.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEfforts to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing have coincided with increasing awareness of sepsis. We aimed to estimate the probability of sepsis following infection consultations in primary care when antibiotics were or were not prescribed. METHODS AND
findingsWe conducted a cohort study including all registered patients at 706 general practices in the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink, with 66.2 million person-years of follow-up from 2002 to 2017. There were 35,244 first episodes of sepsis (17,886, 51%, female; median age 71 years, interquartile range 57-82 years). Consultations for respiratory tract infection (RTI), skin or urinary tract infection (UTI), and antibiotic prescriptions were exposures. A Bayesian decision tree was used to estimate the probability (95% uncertainty intervals [UIs]) of sepsis following an infection consultation. Age, gender, and frailty were evaluated as association modifiers. The probability of sepsis was lower if an antibiotic was prescribed, but the number of antibiotic prescriptions required to prevent one episode of sepsis (number needed to treat [NNT]) decreased with age. At 0-4 years old, the NNT was 29,773 (95% UI 18,458-71,091) in boys and 27,014 (16,739-65,709) in girls; over 85 years old, NNT was 262 (236-293) in men and 385 (352-421) in women. Frailty was associated with greater risk of sepsis and lower NNT. For severely frail patients aged 55-64 years, the NNT was 247 (156-459) in men and 343 (234-556) in women. At all ages, the probability of sepsis was greatest for UTI, followed by skin infection, followed by RTI. At 65-74 years, the NNT following RTI was 1,257 (1,112-1,434) in men and 2,278 (1,966-2,686) in women; the NNT following skin infection was 503 (398-646) in men and 784 (602-1,051) in women; following UTI, the NNT was 121 (102-145) in men and 284 (241-342) in women. NNT values were generally smaller for the period from 2014 to 2017, when sepsis was diagnosed more frequently. Lack of random allocation to antibiotic therapy might have biased estimates; patients may sometimes experience sepsis or receive antibiotic prescriptions without these being recorded in primary care; recording of sepsis has increased over the study period.
conclusionsThese stratified estimates of risk help to identify groups in which antibiotic prescribing may be more safely reduced. Risks of sepsis and benefits of antibiotics are more substantial among older adults, persons with more advanced frailty, or following UTIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.