Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32702001›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2020

Probability of sepsis after infection consultations in primary care in the United Kingdom in 2002-2017: Population-based cohort study and decision analytic model.

Martin C Gulliford, Judith Charlton, Joanne R Winter, Xiaohui Sun, Emma Rezel-Potts, Catey Bunce, Robin Fox, Paul Little, Alastair D Hay, Michael V Moore and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Hospital admission after primary care consultation for community-onset lower urinary tract infection: a cohort study of risks and predictors using linked data.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Antimicrobial stewardship in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based cohort study and interrupted time-series analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  15. Frailty associated urinary tract infections (FaUTIs).Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Frailty Status Predicts Urinary Tract Infection Risk Following Kidney Transplant.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Martin C GullifordSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1898-9075
Judith CharltonSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Joanne R WinterSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0289-4648
Xiaohui SunSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1576-4903
Emma Rezel-PottsSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2986-792X
Catey BunceSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0935-3713
Robin FoxThe Health Centre, Bicester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1131-5545
Paul LittlePrimary Care Research Group, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Alastair D HayCentre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3012-375X
Michael V MoorePrimary Care Research Group, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5127-4509
Mark AshworthSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
SafeAB Study Group
King's College London · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBBicester Community Hospital · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Department of Health 16-116-46Department of Health 16/116/46
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEfforts to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing have coincided with increasing awareness of sepsis. We aimed to estimate the probability of sepsis following infection consultations in primary care when antibiotics were or were not prescribed. METHODS AND

findingsWe conducted a cohort study including all registered patients at 706 general practices in the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink, with 66.2 million person-years of follow-up from 2002 to 2017. There were 35,244 first episodes of sepsis (17,886, 51%, female; median age 71 years, interquartile range 57-82 years). Consultations for respiratory tract infection (RTI), skin or urinary tract infection (UTI), and antibiotic prescriptions were exposures. A Bayesian decision tree was used to estimate the probability (95% uncertainty intervals [UIs]) of sepsis following an infection consultation. Age, gender, and frailty were evaluated as association modifiers. The probability of sepsis was lower if an antibiotic was prescribed, but the number of antibiotic prescriptions required to prevent one episode of sepsis (number needed to treat [NNT]) decreased with age. At 0-4 years old, the NNT was 29,773 (95% UI 18,458-71,091) in boys and 27,014 (16,739-65,709) in girls; over 85 years old, NNT was 262 (236-293) in men and 385 (352-421) in women. Frailty was associated with greater risk of sepsis and lower NNT. For severely frail patients aged 55-64 years, the NNT was 247 (156-459) in men and 343 (234-556) in women. At all ages, the probability of sepsis was greatest for UTI, followed by skin infection, followed by RTI. At 65-74 years, the NNT following RTI was 1,257 (1,112-1,434) in men and 2,278 (1,966-2,686) in women; the NNT following skin infection was 503 (398-646) in men and 784 (602-1,051) in women; following UTI, the NNT was 121 (102-145) in men and 284 (241-342) in women. NNT values were generally smaller for the period from 2014 to 2017, when sepsis was diagnosed more frequently. Lack of random allocation to antibiotic therapy might have biased estimates; patients may sometimes experience sepsis or receive antibiotic prescriptions without these being recorded in primary care; recording of sepsis has increased over the study period.

conclusionsThese stratified estimates of risk help to identify groups in which antibiotic prescribing may be more safely reduced. Risks of sepsis and benefits of antibiotics are more substantial among older adults, persons with more advanced frailty, or following UTIs.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesDrug PrescriptionsFemaleFrail ElderlyFrailtyHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfectionsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID32702001
PMCPMC7377386
OpenAlexW3044305657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.