Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32702000›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Microbial community dissimilarity for source tracking with application in forensic studies.

Kyle M Carter, Meng Lu, Qianwen Luo, Hongmei Jiang, Lingling An

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kyle M CarterInterdisciplinary Program in Statistics and Data Science, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States.
Meng LuInterdisciplinary Program in Statistics and Data Science, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States.
Qianwen LuoDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Hongmei JiangDepartment of Statistics, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, United States of America.
Lingling AnInterdisciplinary Program in Statistics and Data Science, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8273-0776

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial source-tracking is a useful tool for trace evidence analysis in Forensics. Community-wide massively parallel sequencing profiles can bypass the need for satellite microbes or marker sets, which are unreliable when handling unstable samples. We propose a novel method utilizing Aitchison distance to select important suspects/sources, and then integrate it with existing algorithms in source tracking to estimate the proportions of microbial sample coming from important suspects/sources. A series of comprehensive simulation studies show that the proposed method is capable of accurate selection and therefore improves the performance of current methods such as Bayesian SourceTracker and FEAST in the presence of noise microbial sources.

Indexed as

Forensic SciencesMicrobiotaBayes Theorem

Identifiers

PMID32702000
PMCPMC7377425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.