Observational studyPloS one2020
Parkinson's disease detection from 20-step walking tests using inertial sensors of a smartphone: Machine learning approach based on an observational case-control study.
Observational study in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03366558 (Sensor-based Motion Characterization in Patients With Parkinson's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Sensor-based Motion Characterization in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Use of Artificial Intelligence and Wearable Inertial Measurement Units in Medicine: Systematic Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning and wearable sensors for automated Parkinson's disease diagnosis aid: a systematic review.Journal of neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Internet of Things Technologies and Machine Learning Methods for Parkinson's Disease Diagnosis, Monitoring and Management: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Pooled it
- Development and clinical translation of smartphone-based digital biomarkers for Parkinson's disease: a structured review.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
- Photonic and nanomaterial-driven optical biosensing strategies for Parkinson's disease.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Review
- Harnessing artificial intelligence: Revolutionizing clinical care for Parkinson's disease.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026Review
- From wrist data to lifespan: elucidating inflammation-driven biological aging via activity rhythms captured by wearable devices.npj aging · 2026Article
- Collecting Feedback From Neurologists and Patients to Guide Development of a Parkinson Disease App (DigiPark): Qualitative, Noninterventional Study.JMIR human factors · 2024Article
- Wearable sensor devices can automatically identify the ON-OFF status of patients with Parkinson's disease through an interpretable machine learning model.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Diagnostic Efficacy and Clinical Relevance of Artificial Intelligence in Detecting Cognitive Decline.Cureus · 2023Review
- Detection of Parkinson's Disease Using Wrist Accelerometer Data and Passive Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Machine Learning-Based Peripheral Artery Disease Identification Using Laboratory-Based Gait Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Artificial Intelligence Models in the Diagnosis of Adult-Onset Dementia Disorders: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Discrimination between healthy and patients with Parkinson's disease from hand resting activity using inertial measurement unit.Biomedical engineering online · 2021Article
- Wearable sensors and features for diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases: A systematic review.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease inducing dystrophy of the motor system. Automatic movement analysis systems have potential in improving patient care by enabling personalized and more accurate adjust of treatment. These systems utilize machine learning to classify the movement properties based on the features derived from the signals. Smartphones can provide an inexpensive measurement platform with their built-in sensors for movement assessment. This study compared three feature selection and nine classification methods for identifying PD patients from control subjects based on accelerometer and gyroscope signals measured with a smartphone during a 20-step walking test. Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) and sequential feature selection with both forward (SFS) and backward (SBS) propagation directions were used in this study. The number of selected features was narrowed down from 201 to 4-15 features by applying SFS and mRMR methods. From the methods compared in this study, the highest accuracy for individual steps was achieved with SFS (7 features) and Naive Bayes classifier (accuracy 75.3%), and the second highest accuracy with SFS (4 features) and k Nearest neighbours (accuracy 75.1%). Leave-one-subject-out cross-validation was used in the analysis. For the overall classification of each subject, which was based on the majority vote of the classified steps, k Nearest Neighbors provided the most accurate result with an accuracy of 84.5% and an error rate of 15.5%. This study shows the differences in feature selection methods and classifiers and provides generalizations for optimizing methodologies for smartphone-based monitoring of PD patients. The results are promising for further developing the analysis system for longer measurements carried out in free-living conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.