Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32701955›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2020

Parkinson's disease detection from 20-step walking tests using inertial sensors of a smartphone: Machine learning approach based on an observational case-control study.

Milla Juutinen, Cassia Wang, Justin Zhu, Juan Haladjian, Jari Ruokolainen, Juha Puustinen, Antti Vehkaoja

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03366558 (Sensor-based Motion Characterization in Patients With Parkinson's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03366558 completednot on this map

Sensor-based Motion Characterization in Patients With Parkinson's Disease

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorSatakunta Central HospitalRan2018 to 2019Enrolled97ConditionsParkinson DiseaseArmsUPDRS questionnaires, 20-step walking test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Milla JuutinenFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-5289-8105
Cassia WangDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Justin ZhuSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Juan HaladjianDepartment of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jari RuokolainenFaculty of Management and Business, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Juha PuustinenUnit of Neurology, Satakunta Hospital District, Pori, Finland.
Antti VehkaojaFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Tampere University · FIHarvard University · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USTampere University of Applied Sciences · FITechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease inducing dystrophy of the motor system. Automatic movement analysis systems have potential in improving patient care by enabling personalized and more accurate adjust of treatment. These systems utilize machine learning to classify the movement properties based on the features derived from the signals. Smartphones can provide an inexpensive measurement platform with their built-in sensors for movement assessment. This study compared three feature selection and nine classification methods for identifying PD patients from control subjects based on accelerometer and gyroscope signals measured with a smartphone during a 20-step walking test. Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) and sequential feature selection with both forward (SFS) and backward (SBS) propagation directions were used in this study. The number of selected features was narrowed down from 201 to 4-15 features by applying SFS and mRMR methods. From the methods compared in this study, the highest accuracy for individual steps was achieved with SFS (7 features) and Naive Bayes classifier (accuracy 75.3%), and the second highest accuracy with SFS (4 features) and k Nearest neighbours (accuracy 75.1%). Leave-one-subject-out cross-validation was used in the analysis. For the overall classification of each subject, which was based on the majority vote of the classified steps, k Nearest Neighbors provided the most accurate result with an accuracy of 84.5% and an error rate of 15.5%. This study shows the differences in feature selection methods and classifiers and provides generalizations for optimizing methodologies for smartphone-based monitoring of PD patients. The results are promising for further developing the analysis system for longer measurements carried out in free-living conditions.

Indexed as

Exercise TestMachine LearningSmartphoneAgedCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParkinson DiseaseSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedStatistics as TopicSupport Vector MachineWalking

Identifiers

PMID32701955
PMCPMC7377496
OpenAlexW3044409733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.